FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52   53   54   55   56   57   58   59  
60   61   62   63   64   65   66   67   68   69   70   71   72   73   74   75   76   77   78   79   80   81   82   83   84   >>   >|  
0; _Decretales_, cap. xiii, _De haereticis_, lib. v, tit. vii. In practice, Innocent III, although very severe towards obdurate heretics, was extremely kind to the ignorant and heretics in good faith. While he banished the Patarins from Viterbo,[1] and razed their houses to the ground, he at the same time protected, against the tyranny of an archpriest of Verona, a society of mystics, the Humiliati, whose orthodoxy was rather doubtful. When, after the massacre of the Albigenses, Pope Innocent was called upon to apply the canon law in the case of Raymond, Count of Toulouse, and to transfer the patrimony of his father to Simon de Montfort, he was the first to draw back from such injustice. Although a framer of severe laws against heresy, he was ready to grant dispensations, when occasion arose. [1] _Gesta Innocentii_, cap. cxxiii, Migne, P.L., vol. ccxiv, col. clxi. We must remember also that the laws he enacted were not at all excessive compared with the strict Roman law, or even with the practice then in vogue in France and Germany. It has been justly said: "The laws and letters of Innocent III never once mention the death penalty for heresy. He merely decrees against them banishment, and the confiscation of their property. When he speaks of having recourse to the secular arm, he means simply the force required to carry out the laws of banishment enacted by his penal code. This code, which seems so pitiless to us, was in reality at that time a great improvement in the treatment of heretics. For its special laws prevented the frequent outbreaks of popular vengeance, which punished not only confessed heretics, but also mere suspects."[1] [1] Luchaire, Innocent III, _et la croisade des Albigeois_, pp. 57, 58. Julien Havet also says: "We must in justice say of Innocent III that, if he did bitterly prosecute heretics, and everywhere put them under the ban, he never demanded the infliction of the death penalty. Ficker has brought this out very clearly." _L'heresie et le bras seculier_, p. 165, n. 3. For Ficker's view, cf. op. cit., pp. 189-192. In fact, the development in the methods of suppressing heresy from the eleventh century, ends with Innocent III in a code that was far more kindly than the cruel customs in vogue at the time. The death penalty of the stake was common in France in the twelfth century, and in the beginning of the thirteenth. Most of the executions were due to the passions of the mob, altho
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52   53   54   55   56   57   58   59  
60   61   62   63   64   65   66   67   68   69   70   71   72   73   74   75   76   77   78   79   80   81   82   83   84   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

Innocent

 

heretics

 

heresy

 
penalty
 

century

 
Ficker
 

banishment

 

enacted

 
France
 
practice

severe

 

suspects

 
Luchaire
 
vengeance
 
punished
 

confessed

 

justice

 

Julien

 

croisade

 
Albigeois

popular

 
prevented
 

haereticis

 

required

 

pitiless

 

special

 
frequent
 
treatment
 

reality

 

improvement


outbreaks

 

prosecute

 

kindly

 

eleventh

 

development

 

methods

 

suppressing

 
customs
 

executions

 

passions


thirteenth
 

common

 
twelfth
 
beginning
 
Decretales
 

infliction

 

brought

 
demanded
 
simply
 

heresie