FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   76   77   78   79   80   81   82   83   84   85   86   87   88   89   90   91   92   93   94   95   96   97   98   99   100  
101   102   103   104   105   106   107   108   109   110   111   112   113   114   115   116   117   118   119   120   121   122   123   124   125   >>   >|  
of the Inquisition to employ it. In his bull _Ad Extirpanda_, he says: "The podesta or ruler (of the city) is hereby ordered to force all captured heretics to confess and accuse their accomplices by torture which will not imperil life or injure limb, just as thieves and robbers are forced to accuse their accomplices, and to confess their crimes; for these heretics are true thieves, murderers of souls, and robbers of the sacraments of God."[1] The Pope here tries to defend the use of torture, by classing heretics with thieves and murderers. A mere comparison is his only argument. [1] Bull _Ad Extirpanda_, in Eymeric, _Directorium_, Appendix, p. 8. This law of Innocent IV was renewed and confirmed November 30, 1259, by Alexander IV,[1] and again on November 3, 1265, by Clement IV.[2] The restriction of Innocent III to use torture "which should not imperil life or injure limb" (_Cogere citra membri diminutionem et mortis periculum_), left a great deal to the discretion of the Inquisitors. Besides flogging, the other punishments inflicted upon those who refused to confess the crime of which they were accused were antecedent imprisonment, the rack, the _strappado_, and the burning coals. [1] Potthast, _Regesta_, no. 17714. [2] Ibid., no. 19433. When after the first interrogatory the prisoner denied what the Inquisitors believed to be very probable or certain, he was thrown into prison. The _durus carcer et arcta vita_ was deemed an excellent method of extorting confessions. "It was pointed out," says Lea, "that judicious restriction of diet not only reduced the body, but weakened the will, and rendered the prisoner less able to resist alternate threats of death and promises of mercy. Starvation, in fact, was reckoned one of the regular and most efficient methods to subdue unwilling witnesses and defendants."[1] This was the usual method employed in Languedoc. "It is the only method," writes Mgr. Douais,[2] "to to extort confessions mentioned either in the records of the notary of the Inquisition of Carcassonne[3] or in the sentences of Bernard Gui. It was also the practice of the Inquisitors across the Rhine." [1] Lea, op. cit., vol. i, p. 421. [2] Douais, _Documents_, vol. i, p. ccxl. [3] Douais, _Documents_, vol. ii, p. 115 and seq. Still the use of torture, especially of the rack and the _strappado_, was not unknown in southern Europe, even before the promulgation of Innocent's bull _Ad Extirpanda
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   76   77   78   79   80   81   82   83   84   85   86   87   88   89   90   91   92   93   94   95   96   97   98   99   100  
101   102   103   104   105   106   107   108   109   110   111   112   113   114   115   116   117   118   119   120   121   122   123   124   125   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

torture

 

thieves

 

Extirpanda

 
Douais
 
method
 

Inquisitors

 

Innocent

 
confess
 

heretics

 

November


strappado

 

accuse

 

confessions

 
Inquisition
 

murderers

 

injure

 

prisoner

 
restriction
 

imperil

 
accomplices

robbers

 
Documents
 

threats

 

weakened

 
alternate
 

promises

 

Europe

 

resist

 

rendered

 

prison


carcer

 

thrown

 

probable

 

deemed

 
judicious
 

pointed

 
extorting
 
excellent
 
Starvation
 

reduced


unwilling

 

Bernard

 

practice

 
sentences
 

records

 

notary

 

Carcassonne

 
promulgation
 

efficient

 
methods