FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   86   87   88   89   90   91   92   93   94   95   96   97   98   99   100   101   102   103   104   105   106   107   108   109   110  
111   112   113   114   115   116   117   118   119   120   121   122   123   124   125   126   127   128   129   130   131   132   133   134   135   >>   >|  
fold, and the fate of Core, Dathan and Abiron was invoked _for the destruction of the obstinate_." (_Summa_, lib. i. tit. v, 2, 4, 8; tit. vi, i.) This is a travesty of the mind, and words of Saint Raymond. He merely called attention to the lot of Core, Dathan and Abiron to show what a great crime schism was. He never asserted that heretics or schismatics, even when obdurate, ought to be "destroyed." _Summa_, lib. i, cap. _De Haereticis_ and _De Schismaticis_. But St. Thomas, who wrote at a time when the Inquisition was in full operation, felt called upon to defend the infliction of the death penalty upon heretics and the relapsed. His words deserve careful consideration. He begins by answering the objections that might be brought from the Scriptures and the Fathers against his thesis. The first of these is the well-known passage of St. Matthew, in which our Saviour forbids the servants of the householder to gather up the cockle before the harvest time, lest they root up the wheat with it.[1] St. John Chrysostom, he says, "argues from this text that it is wrong to put heretics to death."[2] But according to St. Augustine the words of the Saviour: "Let the cockle grow until the harvest," are explained at once by what follows: "lest perhaps gathering up the cockle, you root up the wheat also with it." When there is no danger of uprooting the wheat and no danger of schism, violent measures may be used:" _Cum metus iste non subest ... non dormiat severitas disciplinae_."[3] We doubt very much whether such reasoning would have satisfied St. John Chrysostom, St. Theodore the Studite, or Bishop Wazo, who understood the Saviour's prohibition in a literal and an absolute sense. [1] Matt. xiii. 28-30. [2] _In Matthaeum_, Homil. xlvi. [3] Augustine, _Contra epistol. Parmeniani_, lib. iii. cap. ii. But this passage does not reveal the whole mind of the Angelic doctor. It is more evident in his exegesis of Ezechiel xviii. 32, _Nolo mortem peccatoris_. "Assuredly," he writes, "none of us desires the death of a single heretic. But remember that the house of David could not obtain peace until Absalom was killed in the war he waged against his father. In like manner, the Catholic Church saves some of her children by the death of others, and consoles her sorrowing heart by reflecting that she is acting for the general good."[1] [1] St. Thomas, _Summa_, loc. cit., ad. 4m. If we are not mistaken, St. Thomas is here trying t
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   86   87   88   89   90   91   92   93   94   95   96   97   98   99   100   101   102   103   104   105   106   107   108   109   110  
111   112   113   114   115   116   117   118   119   120   121   122   123   124   125   126   127   128   129   130   131   132   133   134   135   >>   >|  



Top keywords:
Thomas
 

Saviour

 

heretics

 
cockle
 

harvest

 

Chrysostom

 

passage

 

Augustine

 
danger
 
called

Dathan

 

Abiron

 

schism

 

reveal

 

reasoning

 

satisfied

 

epistol

 

literal

 

prohibition

 
absolute

understood
 

Matthaeum

 
Parmeniani
 

Studite

 

Bishop

 

Contra

 

Theodore

 
single
 
children
 

consoles


sorrowing
 

reflecting

 

father

 

manner

 

Catholic

 

Church

 

acting

 

mistaken

 

general

 

mortem


peccatoris

 

Assuredly

 

Ezechiel

 
doctor
 

evident

 

exegesis

 

writes

 

obtain

 

Absalom

 

killed