FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   101   102   103   104   105   106   107   108   109   110   111   112   113   114   115   116   117   118   119   120   121   122   123   124   125  
126   127   128   129   130   131   132   133   134   135   136   137   >>  
it., p. 106. [2] Cf. Bleda, _Defensio fidei in causa neophytorum sive Moriscorum regni Valentini totiusque Hispaniae,_, Valencia, 1610. The witchcraft fever which spread over Europe in the fifteenth and sixteenth centuries stimulated to an extraordinary degree the zeal of the Inquisitors. The bull of Innocent VIII, _Summis Desiderantes_, December 5, 1484, made matters worse. The Pope admitted that men and women could have immoral relations with demon, and that sorcerers by their magical incantations could injure the harvests, the vineyards, the orchards and the fields.[1] [1] _Bullarium_, vol. v, p. 296 and seq., and Pegna's _Bullarium_ in Eymeric, _Directorium Inquisit_., p. 83. He also complained of the folly of those ecclesiastics and laymen who opposed the Inquisition in its prosecution of heretical sorcerers, and concluded by conferring additional powers upon the Dominican Inquisitors, Institoris and Sprenger, the author of the famous _Malleus Maleficarum_. Innocent VIII assuredly had no intention of committing the Church to a belief in the phenomena he mentioned in his bull, but his personal opinion did leave an influence upon the canonists and Inquisitors of his day; this is clear from the trials for witchcraft held during this period.[1] It is impossible to estimate the number of sorcerers condemned. Louis of Paramo triumphantly declared that in a century and a half the Holy Office sent to the stake over thirty thousand.[2] Of course we must take such round numbers with a grain of salt, as they always are greatly exaggerated. But the fact remains that the condemnations for sorcery were so numerous as to stagger belief. The Papacy itself recognized the injustice of its agents. For in 1637 instructions were issued stigmatizing the conduct of the Inquisitors on account of their arbitrary and unjust prosecution of sorcerers; they were accused of extorting from them by cruel tortures confessions that were valueless, and of abandoning them to the secular arm without sufficient cause.[1] [1] Pignatelli, _Consultationes novissimae canonicae, Venetiis_, 2 in fol., vol. i, p. 505, _Consultatio_ 123. . . . . . . . . Confiscation, though not so severe a penalty as the stake, bore very heavily upon the victims of the Inquisition. The Roman laws classed the crime of heresy with treason, and visited it with a principal penalty, death, and a secondary penalty, confiscation. They decreed that all heretics, wit
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   101   102   103   104   105   106   107   108   109   110   111   112   113   114   115   116   117   118   119   120   121   122   123   124   125  
126   127   128   129   130   131   132   133   134   135   136   137   >>  



Top keywords:

Inquisitors

 

sorcerers

 

penalty

 
Bullarium
 
Inquisition
 

Innocent

 

prosecution

 
belief
 

witchcraft

 

stagger


numerous

 

sorcery

 

condemnations

 
exaggerated
 

remains

 

Papacy

 

recognized

 
issued
 

stigmatizing

 
conduct

instructions

 
greatly
 

injustice

 

agents

 
Office
 

thirty

 

thousand

 

century

 

Paramo

 

triumphantly


declared

 

spread

 

account

 

numbers

 
unjust
 

victims

 
classed
 
heavily
 
severe
 

Valencia


heresy

 

treason

 

decreed

 
heretics
 

confiscation

 

visited

 

principal

 
secondary
 

Confiscation

 
abandoning