Madrid.

TORQUEMADA, Juan de
1723 Monarquia Indiana. Madrid. 3 vols.

TOZZER, Alfred Marston
1907 Comparative Study of the Mayas and Lacandones. New York.

1911 Preliminary Study of the Ruins of Tikal, Guatemala. _Peabody
Museum Memoirs_, vol. v, no. 2. Cambridge, Mass.

1912 A Spanish Manuscript Letter on the Lacandones. _Rept. 18th Sess.
Int. Cong. Am._

1917 The Books of Chilam Balam. _Rept. 19th Sess. Inter. Cong. of
Americanists_.

ULLOA Y SANTACILLA, Jorge Juan de and Antonio de
1748 Relacion historica del viage a la America Meridional. Madrid. 4
vols.

VALENTINI, Philip J. J.
1880 The Katunes of Maya History. Translated by Stephen Salisbury, Jr.
_Proc. Am. Antiq. Society_, pp. 59-61, October. Worcester.

1898 Pinzon-Solis, 1508. _Gesell. fuer Erdkunde, Zeitschrift_ xxxiii,
pp. 254-282.

1902 The Discovery of Yucatan by the Portuguese in 1493. An Ancient
Chart. _Records of the Past_, vol. i, pp. 45-59.

VILLAGUTIERRE Y SOTOMAYOR, Juan de
1701 Historia de la conquista de la provincia de el Itza. Madrid.

WIENER, Charles
1875 Malartic Portolan. Paris.

Plate IA. Avendano's Map of Lake Peten, circa 1697

Plate IB. Avendano's Map with English Translation

Plate II. Peten Itza in the Middle of the Eighteenth Century

Plate III. Lake Peten and Flores

Plate IV. Sketch (with English Translation) of a Map of Yucatan, circa
1566, found with the Landa Ms.

Plate V. Sketch (with English Translation) of Another Map of Yucatan,
circa 1566, found with the Landa Ms.

Plate VI. Map showing Entradas to Lake Peten

[Transcriber's Note: This map in drastically incomplete because of the
folds. The map is intended to show the Entradas of Cortez (1524-1525),
Fuensalida and Orbita (1618), Gallegos and Delgado (1675), President
Barrios (1694-1695), Padre Cano (1695), and Padre Andres de Avendano
y Loyola (1695, 1696).]

FOOTNOTES:
Chapter I.

[Footnote 1: Mr. Bowditch (1901, p. 137) says that the earliest date at
Quirigua is that on Stela C: 9.1.0.0.0. and that the latest is that on
Stela K: 9.18.15.0.0. According to his reckoning these dates correspond
approximately to 75 B.C. and 275 A.D. respectively. Mr. Bowditch
informs us that other cities in the south show similar dates, and at
the same time he points out that it is possible that these cities were
occupied beyond the latest dates shown on the stelae. We see, then,
that the difference between Mr. Bowditch's com