FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   48   49   50   51   52   53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   65   66   67   68   69   70   71   72  
73   74   75   76   77   78   79   80   81   82   83   84   85   86   87   >>  
, and to each succeeding son a single part. The Commentator asks, why that division was not adhered to; and he solves his own question by the remark, that it was disliked by the people, and therefore rightly abandoned. This position he supports by several quotations, and by allusion to the abolition or non-observance of other ancient ordinances, _e.g._ the raising up of male heirs by the brother of the husband or others. It is an obvious reflection, that the altered law of distribution is one of the few instances in the Hindu economy where an innate feeling of natural equality has overcome or superseded arbitrary rule--and further, that the change has been brought about by the pressure of the old law upon the privileged casts, who, in common with others, were affected by it.] [Footnote 180: Manu, ch. 9, sl. 206, 208.] [Footnote 181: When the recovered properly is land, he who obtained it shall take a fourth part, the remainder to be equally divided. (_M._) The Commentator supports this view by the authority of Sankha. Manu, ch. 9, sl. 209.] [Footnote 182: Supra, Book 1, sl. 3.] [Footnote 183: Manu, ch. 9, sl. 215.] [Footnote 184: The Commentator refers, in explanation of this sloka, to Manu, ch. 9, sl. 216, _viz._ A son born after a division shall alone inherit the patrimony [_i. e._ the share allotted to the parents (_M._)], or shall have a share of it with the divided brethren, if they return and unite themselves with him.--With respect to the deduction for expenditure, &c., the Commentator explains, that the accumulations of mere income are not to be included in the estate to be repartitioned, and that a previous deduction is to be made for necessary expenditure, _e.g._ the father's debts.] [Footnote 185: but, if she have _stridhana_, only a half share. (_M._)] [Footnote 186: Manu, ch. 9, sl. 118.] [Footnote 187: These varying proportions ofcourse apply only where there are several mothers of differing casts. Manu, ch. 9, sl. 148-157.] [Footnote 188: or escaped notice altogether. (_M._) Manu, ch. 9, sl. 218.] [Footnote 189: Manu, ch. 9, sl. 59, 145, 167, 190.] [Footnote 190: But if the actual father have already a son, his son by another's wife is not his heir. (_M._)] [Footnote 191: _aurasa_ is from _uras_ 'the best,' being the first in order of sons.] [Footnote 192: _dharma_ wife is defined by the Commentator, a wife of the same cast with her husband, and wedded to him according to
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   48   49   50   51   52   53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   65   66   67   68   69   70   71   72  
73   74   75   76   77   78   79   80   81   82   83   84   85   86   87   >>  



Top keywords:

Footnote

 

Commentator

 

husband

 

deduction

 

father

 

expenditure

 
supports
 

division

 
divided
 
repartitioned

estate

 
patrimony
 
inherit
 

included

 
previous
 

brethren

 
accumulations
 

explains

 
income
 

respect


parents

 
return
 

allotted

 

aurasa

 

actual

 

wedded

 

defined

 

dharma

 

varying

 

proportions


ofcourse

 

stridhana

 

notice

 
altogether
 
escaped
 

mothers

 

differing

 

remainder

 

brother

 

obvious


reflection

 

ancient

 
ordinances
 

raising

 
altered
 
distribution
 

innate

 
feeling
 
natural
 

equality