accorded to Colley Cibber, while Johnson was kept waiting in an
anteroom: this, however, has been denied by Boswell on the authority
of Johnson himself. There seems to be no doubt that Chesterfield
neglected Johnson while he was struggling with the "Dictionary." The
articles which he wrote for the _World_, to which the first sentence
in the letter refers, are believed to have been written with a view to
securing from Johnson a dedication of the "Dictionary" to himself. Mr.
Stephen remarks on the "singular dignity and energy" of Johnson's
letter. Johnson did not make it public in his own lifetime, but
ultimately gave copies of it to two of his friends, one of whom was
Boswell. Boswell published it in his "Life of Johnson," and deposited
the original in the British Museum. Chesterfield made no reply to the
letter, but, in conversation with Dodsley, the bookseller, a friend of
both men, said he had always been ready to receive Johnson, and blamed
Johnson's pride and shyness for the outcome of the acquaintance.
Chesterfield was long thought to have referred to Johnson as a
"respectable Hottentot," this being on the authority of Boswell, but
Dr. Birkbeck Hill has shown that this was not true. Mr. Stephen
declares that Johnson's letter "justifies itself," and that no author
can fail to sympathize with his declaration of literary
independence.]
[Footnote 27: From No. 117 of _The Rambler._]
[Footnote 28: This translation of the passage from Lucretius is
Dryden's.]
DAVID HUME
Born in 1711, died in 1776; educated at Edinburgh; lived in
France from 1734 to 1737; accompanied Gen. St. Clair on an
embassy to Vienna and Turin as judge-advocate; appointed
keeper of the Advocates' Library at Edinburgh in 1752;
visited France again in 1763; Under-secretary of State in
1767; published his treatise on "Human Nature" in 1739; his
"Essays" in 1741; his "Human Understanding" in 1748; his
"History of England" in 1754-61.
I
THE CHARACTER OF QUEEN ELIZABETH[29]
So dark a cloud overcast the evening of that day, which had shone out
with a mighty luster in the eyes of all Europe! There are few great
personages in history who have been more exposed to the calumny of
enemies and the adulation of friends than Queen Elizabeth; and yet
there is scarcely any whose reputation has been more certainly
determined by the unanimous consent of posterity. The unusual length
of her administra
|