FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   1823   1824   1825   1826   1827   1828   1829   1830   1831   1832   1833   1834   1835   1836   1837   1838   1839   1840   1841   1842   1843   1844   1845   1846   1847  
1848   1849   1850   1851   1852   1853   1854   1855   1856   1857   1858   1859   1860   1861   1862   1863   1864   1865   1866   1867   1868   1869   1870   1871   1872   >>   >|  
de by the ambassador. They remarked:--"We will concede that the first outrage was committed by subordinate local authorities, whose acts might admit of excuse or explanation; but the subsequent imprisonment was deliberately ordered by a high public functionary, the official depositary-, in fact, of the treaties existing between the two countries, one who could not be ignorant of the privileges they guaranteed, and who was not ignorant that in the instance in question he was grossly and intentionally violating them. Considering, therefore, that the present is not the only instance, although the most flagrant one, of personal violence offered to British subjects, we cannot but see in their repeated occurrence, more especially of late, an intentional infraction of the treaties, and, indeed, the existence of some fixed design on the part of the Turkish government to assume to itself a power of control in such matters which it would be dangerous ever to concede." Before the determination of the British cabinet could be known, the divan of Constantinople had resolved to yield: the reis effendi was dismissed, with a monthly pension of 10,000 piastres; but it was on the pretence that bad health disabled him from regularly attending to the duties of his office. It was said afterwards, that the British ministry viewed the matter in a less serious light than that in which it had been viewed by Lord Ponsonby; and that they were not inclined to consider the demand he had made as one on which it was necessary to insist. It is certain, indeed, that the dispatches of the Turkish envoy ill London, subsequent to the dismissal of the reis effendi, assured the divan of the readiness of the British ministry to settle the controversy on conditions much milder than those on which Lord Ponsonby had stated to be the only terms which his majesty's government could consider proper reparation for the insult offered to its dignity. It is also certain that the credit of the British ambassador, whose successful firmness was neutralised by his government, was greatly diminished at the Porte. CHAPTER XLVII. {WILLIAM IV. 1836--1837} _Meeting of Parliament..... Consideration of the State of Ireland..... Irish Municipal Corporations Bill..... Question of Establishing a System of Poor-Law in Ireland..... Irish Tithe Question..... Question of Church- Rates..... The Church of Scotland..... Notices of Motions
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   1823   1824   1825   1826   1827   1828   1829   1830   1831   1832   1833   1834   1835   1836   1837   1838   1839   1840   1841   1842   1843   1844   1845   1846   1847  
1848   1849   1850   1851   1852   1853   1854   1855   1856   1857   1858   1859   1860   1861   1862   1863   1864   1865   1866   1867   1868   1869   1870   1871   1872   >>   >|  



Top keywords:
British
 

Question

 

government

 

treaties

 
Ponsonby
 
Turkish
 

instance

 

ignorant

 

viewed

 
ministry

effendi

 

ambassador

 

concede

 

Church

 

offered

 

Ireland

 

subsequent

 

assured

 

insist

 
readiness

dismissal
 

dispatches

 

London

 

duties

 

office

 

attending

 

regularly

 

matter

 

inclined

 
demand

settle

 
insult
 
Parliament
 

Consideration

 
Municipal
 
Meeting
 
WILLIAM
 

Corporations

 
Scotland
 

Notices


Motions

 
Establishing
 

System

 

CHAPTER

 

majesty

 

proper

 

reparation

 

stated

 

conditions

 

milder