FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   1859   1860   1861   1862   1863   1864   1865   1866   1867   1868   1869   1870   1871   1872   1873   1874   1875   1876   1877   1878   1879   1880   1881   1882   1883  
1884   1885   1886   1887   1888   1889   1890   1891   1892   1893   1894   1895   1896   1897   1898   1899   1900   1901   1902   1903   1904   1905   1906   1907   1908   >>   >|  
ation of the king," originally levied during the captivity of King Ferdinand. This impost had been kept up though the king was now dead. There were other grievances of a similar kind: the only one redressed was a tax on military quarters, which had been ceded to the English residents. Lord Mahon concluded by calling Lord Palmerston's attention to the provinces of Biscay and Navarre, which had been deprived of their legal rights and privileges; and by stating that in bringing the subject forward, he was not actuated by any partiality for the character of Don Carlos, or any desire of advocating his claims on the crown of Spain. Mr. Cutlar Fergusson, while he admired the moderate and gentlemanly tone of Lord Mahon's speech, yet differed from his views. He defended the alteration which Ferdinand had made in the succession, and which had been approved of by the Cortes, while they looked upon Don Carlos as a pretender. The question for the house was whether this country was not justified in abiding by the terms of the quadripartite treaty. We had done no more, he said, till Don Carlos had published the edict of Durango: after that infamous act an important article had been appended to the treaty, stipulating that arms and stores should be supplied for the maintenance of the war, and, if necessary, a naval force. Mr. Gaily Knight also dissented from Mr. Fergusson's views; while Mr. Fenton expressed his disapprobation of Lord Palmerston's policy. Lord Francis Egerton said that in his opinion we were not the proper judges of the value of those rights and privileges for which the Basques were contending; if they themselves held them dear, every Englishman must feel a sympathy in their cause. Mr. Fergusson had admitted, that could we have foreseen the failure of the Spanish generals, it would have altered the question as to the policy of suspending the foreign enlistment act: were not ministers culpable for such a want of foresight? Surely Lord Palmerston and his colleagues might have distinguished between Spain in the sixteenth century, when her troops were the first in Europe, and Spain during the peninsular war. Had not Lord Palmerston been in office during the war of independence? And had not its records taught him something of Spanish generals and Spanish promises? At any rate, a glance at the pages of a Napier, or a word from the Duke of Wellington would have enlightened him on the subject. Mr. Cutlar Fergusson explained, and
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   1859   1860   1861   1862   1863   1864   1865   1866   1867   1868   1869   1870   1871   1872   1873   1874   1875   1876   1877   1878   1879   1880   1881   1882   1883  
1884   1885   1886   1887   1888   1889   1890   1891   1892   1893   1894   1895   1896   1897   1898   1899   1900   1901   1902   1903   1904   1905   1906   1907   1908   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

Palmerston

 

Fergusson

 
Spanish
 

Carlos

 

treaty

 

subject

 

question

 

privileges

 

rights

 
policy

generals
 

Cutlar

 

Ferdinand

 
Englishman
 
maintenance
 

supplied

 

admitted

 
sympathy
 

explained

 
opinion

Egerton

 
dissented
 
expressed
 

Francis

 

Fenton

 

Knight

 
proper
 

contending

 

disapprobation

 
Basques

judges
 

distinguished

 

sixteenth

 

taught

 

colleagues

 

promises

 

foresight

 

Surely

 

records

 
century

independence
 
office
 

Europe

 

troops

 

altered

 
Napier
 

peninsular

 

foreseen

 

failure

 

Wellington