FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   209   210   211   212   213   214   215   216   217   218   219   220   221   222   223   224   225   226   227   228   229   230   231   232   233  
234   235   236   237   238   239   240   241   242   243   244   245   246   247   248   249   250   251   252   253   254   255   256   257   258   >>   >|  
f come all this time? I have kept this letter to go back with it. I had a proposition from the New York booksellers about six weeks ago (the booksellers who printed the poems) to let them re-print those prose papers of mine in the _Athenaeum_, with additional matter on American literature, in a volume by itself--to be published at the same time both in America and England by Wiley and Putnam in Waterloo Place, and meaning to offer liberal terms, they said. Now what shall I do? Those papers are not fit for separate publication, and I am not inclined to the responsibility of them; and in any case, they must give as much trouble as if they were re-written (trouble and not poetry!), before I could consent to such a thing. Well!--and if I do not ... these people are just as likely to print them without leave ... and so without correction. What do you advise? What shall I do? All this time they think me sublimely indifferent, they who pressed for an answer by return of packet--and now it is past six ... eight weeks; and I must say something. Am I not 'femme qui parle' to-day? And let me talk on ever so, the proof won't come. May God bless you--and me as I am Yours, E.B.B. And the silent promise I would have you make is this--that if ever you should leave me, it shall be (though you are not 'selfish') for your sake--and not for mine: for your good, and not for mine. I ask it--not because I am disinterested; but because one class of motives would be valid, and the other void--simply for that reason. Then the _femme qui parle_ (looking back over the parlance) did not mean to say on the first page of this letter that she was ever for a moment _vexed in her pride_ that she should owe anything to her adversities. It was only because adversities are accidents and not essentials. If it had been prosperities, it would have been the same thing--no, not the same thing!--but far worse. Occy is up to-day and doing well. _R.B. to E.B.B._ [Post-mark, October 27, 1845.] How does one make 'silent promises' ... or, rather, how does the maker of them communicate that fact to whomsoever it may concern? I know, there have been many, very many unutterable vows and promises made,--that is, _thought_ down upon--the white slip at the top of my notes,--such as of this note; and not trusted to th
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   209   210   211   212   213   214   215   216   217   218   219   220   221   222   223   224   225   226   227   228   229   230   231   232   233  
234   235   236   237   238   239   240   241   242   243   244   245   246   247   248   249   250   251   252   253   254   255   256   257   258   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

promises

 

adversities

 
trouble
 

silent

 

booksellers

 

papers

 

letter

 
moment
 

simply

 

reason


motives

 

parlance

 

disinterested

 

concern

 

unutterable

 
whomsoever
 

communicate

 
trusted
 

thought

 

prosperities


essentials

 

accidents

 

October

 
selfish
 

Putnam

 

Waterloo

 
meaning
 

England

 
published
 

America


liberal
 
separate
 
publication
 
volume
 

proposition

 

printed

 

matter

 

American

 

literature

 

additional


Athenaeum

 
inclined
 

responsibility

 

packet

 

return

 

pressed

 

answer

 
promise
 
indifferent
 

sublimely