FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   74   75   76   77   78   79   80   81   82   83   84   85   86   87   88   89   90   91   92   93   94   95   96   97   98  
99   100   101   102   103   104   105   106   107   108   109   110   111   112   113   114   115   116   117   118   119   120   121   122   123   >>   >|  
action which I wish John to perform, and affirmation is the _inferential_ meaning. The verb in the infinitive, as well as in the imperative mood, is divested of its affirmative or verbal force. In both these moods, it is always presented in its _noun-state_. If, after dinner, I say to a servant, "_Wine,"_ he infers, that I wish him to bring me wine; but all this is not said. If I say, _Bring_ some _wine_, he, in like manner, understands, that I wish him to bring me wine; but all that is expressed, is the _name_ of the action, and of the object of the action. In fact, as much is done by _inference_, as by actual expression, in every branch of language, for thought is too quick to be wholly transmitted by words. It is generally conceded, that the termination of our verbs, _est, eth, s, ed_, and, also, of the other parts of speech, were originally separate words of distinct meaning; and that, although they have been contracted, and, by the refinement of language, have been made to coalesce with the words in connexion with which they are employed, yet, in their present character of terminations, they retain their primitive meaning and force. To denote that a verbal name was employed as a verb, the Saxons affixed to it a verbalizing adjunct; thus, _the_ (to take, hold) was the noun-state of the verb; and when they used it as a verb, they added the termination _an_; thus, the_an_. The termination added, was a sign that _affirmation_ was intended. The same procedure has been adopted, and, in many instances, is still practised, in our language. _An_, originally affixed to our verbs, in the progress of refinement, was changed to en, and finally dropped. A few centuries ago, the plural number of our verbs was denoted by the termination, _en_; thus, they _weren_, they _loven_; but, as these terminations do not supersede the necessity of expressing the _subject_ of affirmation, as is the case in the Latin and Greek verbs, they have been laid aside, as unnecessary excrescences. For the same reason, we might, without any disparagement to the language, dispense with the terminations of our verbs in the singular. In support of the position, that these terminations were once separate words, we can trace many of them to their origin. To denote the feminine gender of some nouns, we af
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   74   75   76   77   78   79   80   81   82   83   84   85   86   87   88   89   90   91   92   93   94   95   96   97   98  
99   100   101   102   103   104   105   106   107   108   109   110   111   112   113   114   115   116   117   118   119   120   121   122   123   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

language

 

terminations

 
termination
 

affirmation

 

action

 

meaning

 
affixed
 
originally
 

separate

 
employed

denote

 
verbal
 

refinement

 

progress

 

adjunct

 

verbalizing

 

practised

 
changed
 

instances

 
procedure

finally

 

intended

 

adopted

 

disparagement

 

dispense

 

singular

 

support

 

reason

 

position

 
gender

feminine
 

origin

 

excrescences

 

unnecessary

 

number

 
denoted
 

plural

 

centuries

 
subject
 
supersede

necessity

 

expressing

 

dropped

 

manner

 

infers

 

understands

 

expressed

 

inference

 

actual

 

object