version. When a new vision
begins from within, then the outward action follows of itself, but no man
will part with what he judges best till he sees something better, and
then the weaker yields to the stronger without any forcing.[33] This
whole work of conversion, of transformation, of "lasting change," must
have its origin in something within ourselves. We cannot turn from
baubles and "toyes" and our "desire for that which is high in the world"
until a Light from some source plainly shows us an eternal reality for
which we may "highly adventure the tryal." There is, our author insists,
only one place where such a guiding Light could arise, and that is within
the soul itself, as an inward and immediate knowledge: "'Tis not far to
seek. We direct thee to within thyself. Thou oughtest to turn into, to
mind and have regard unto, that which is within thee, to wit, the Light
of Truth, the true Light which enlighteneth every man that cometh into
the world. Here 'tis that thou must be and not without thee. Here thou
shalt find a Principle certain and infallible, through which increasing
and going on into, thou mayest at length arrive unto a happy condition.
Of this thou mayest highly adventure the tryal. And if thou happenest to
be one of those that would know all things before thou dost begin~.~.~.
know this, Thou dost therein just as those that would learn to read
without knowing the Letters. He that will not adventure till he be fully
satisfied, shall never begin, much less finish {130} his own salvation.
We say then, that we exhort every one to turn unto the Light that's in
him."[34]
In true Cartesian fashion, he demonstrates why this Light must have its
locus within the soul and not in some external means or medium. All
knowledge that God is being revealed in external signs, or through
external means, already presupposes a prior knowledge of God. We can
judge no doctrine, no Book to be Divine except by some inward and
immediate knowledge of what really is Divine. Without this Light the
Scriptures are only Words and Letters. But "if we experience that the
Book called the Bible in regard to the Divine doctrine therein comprised
hath such a harmony with That [in us] by which God is known, that He must
needs have been the Author of it, there cannot rationally be any more
powerful demonstration."[35]
The same principle is true with regard to every conceivable form of
revelation which could be made to our outw
|