FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   93   94   95   96   97   98   99   100   101   102   103   104   105   106   107   108   109   110   111   112   113   114   115   116   117  
118   119   120   121   122   123   124   125   126   127   >>  
enerally on easy--sometimes on cordial--terms with him as a man. He has left us a fine and discriminating portrait of Byron in the 'Count Maddalo' of his poem _Julian and Maddalo_, written in 1818. At times however Shelley felt and expressed great indignation against Byron, especially in reference to the ungenerous and cruel conduct of the latter towards Miss Clairmont. See some brief reference to this matter at p. 9. 11. 3-5. _Whose fame Over his living head like heaven is bent, An early but enduring monument._ These phrases are not very definite. When fame is spoken of as being bent over Byron's head, we must conceive of fame as taking a form cognizable by the senses. I think Shelley means to assimilate it to the rainbow; saying substantially--Fame is like an arc bent over Byron's head, as the arc of the rainbow is bent over the expanse of heaven. The ensuing term 'monument' applies rather to fame in the abstract than to any image of fame as an arc. 11. 6, 7. _Came, veiling all the lightnings of his song In sorrow._ No doubt it would have been satisfactory to Shelley if he could have found that Byron entertained or expressed any serious concern at Keats's premature death, and at the hard measure which had been meted out to him by critics. Byron did in fact admire _Hyperion_; writing (in November 1821, not long after the publication of _Adonais_)--'His fragment of _Hyperion_ seems actually inspired by the Titans, and is as sublime as Aeschylus'; and other utterances of his show that--being with difficulty persuaded to suppose that Keats's health and life had succumbed to the attack in the _Quarterly_--he fittingly censured the want of feeling or want of reflection on the critic's part which had produced so deplorable a result. But on the whole Byron's feeling towards Keats was one of savage contempt during the young poet's life, and of bantering levity after his death. Here are some specimens. (From a letter to Mr. Murray, 12 October, 1820). 'There is such a trash of Keats and the like upon my tables that I am ashamed to look at them.... No more Keats, I entreat. Flay him alive: if some of you don't, I must skin him myself. There is no bearing the drivelling idiotism of the manikin.' '"Who killed John Keats?" "I," says the Quarterly, So savage and Tartarly; "'Twas one of my feats."' 'John Keats, who was killed off by one critique Just as he really promised something
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   93   94   95   96   97   98   99   100   101   102   103   104   105   106   107   108   109   110   111   112   113   114   115   116   117  
118   119   120   121   122   123   124   125   126   127   >>  



Top keywords:

Shelley

 
heaven
 

Hyperion

 

rainbow

 

Quarterly

 

savage

 
feeling
 

monument

 

killed

 

expressed


reference

 

Maddalo

 

utterances

 
Aeschylus
 
sublime
 

Titans

 

manikin

 

difficulty

 

censured

 

fittingly


succumbed
 

health

 
inspired
 

persuaded

 
suppose
 
attack
 

Tartarly

 

critique

 

promised

 
admire

writing
 
November
 
publication
 
Adonais
 

reflection

 

fragment

 

critic

 

specimens

 

letter

 
bantering

entreat

 

levity

 

October

 
tables
 

ashamed

 

Murray

 

deplorable

 
result
 

bearing

 

produced