FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   86   87   88   89   90   91   92   93   94   95   96   97   98   99   100   101   102   103   104   105   106   107   108   109   110  
111   112   113   114   115   116   117   118   119   120   121   122   123   124   125   126   127   128   129   130   131   132   133   134   135   >>   >|  
aine. Four censuses of Acadia while it belonged to the French had recognized the mainland as included in it; and so do also the early French maps. Its prodigious shrinkage was simply the consequence of its possession by an alien. [Footnote 121: The commission of De Monts, in 1603, defines Acadia as extending from the fortieth to the forty-sixth degrees of latitude,--that is, from central New Brunswick to southern Pennsylvania. Neither party cared to produce the document.] [Footnote 122: "L'Acadie suivant ses anciennes limites est la presquisle bornee par son isthme." _La Galissoniere au Ministre, 25 Juillet, 1749_. The English commissioners were, of course, ignorant of this admission.] [Footnote 123: _Memoire de l'Abbee de l'Isle-Dieu, 1753_ (1754?).] Other questions of limits, more important and equally perilous, called loudly for solution. What line should separate Canada and her western dependencies from the British colonies? Various principles of demarcation were suggested, of which the most prominent on the French side was a geographical one. All countries watered by streams falling into the St. Lawrence, the Great Lakes, and the Mississippi were to belong to her. This would have planted her in the heart of New York and along the crests of the Alleghanies, giving her all the interior of the continent, and leaving nothing to England but a strip of sea-coast. Yet in view of what France had achieved; of the patient gallantry of her explorers, the zeal of her missionaries, the adventurous hardihood of her bushrangers, revealing to civilized mankind the existence of this wilderness world, while her rivals plodded at their workshops, their farms, or their fisheries,--in view of all this, her pretensions were moderate and reasonable compared with those of England. The treaty of Utrecht had declared the Iroquois, or Five Nations, to be British subjects; therefore it was insisted that all countries conquered by them belonged to the British Crown. But what was an Iroquois conquest? The Iroquois rarely occupied the countries they overran. Their military expeditions were mere raids, great or small. Sometimes, as in the case of the Hurons, they made a solitude and called it peace; again, as in the case of the Illinois, they drove off the occupants of the soil, who returned after the invaders were gone. But the range of their war-parties was prodigious; and the English laid claim to every mountain, forest, or prairie wher
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   86   87   88   89   90   91   92   93   94   95   96   97   98   99   100   101   102   103   104   105   106   107   108   109   110  
111   112   113   114   115   116   117   118   119   120   121   122   123   124   125   126   127   128   129   130   131   132   133   134   135   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

Iroquois

 

Footnote

 

British

 

French

 

countries

 

England

 
belonged
 

called

 

English

 

prodigious


Acadia
 

bushrangers

 

revealing

 

belong

 

hardihood

 

Mississippi

 

adventurous

 

workshops

 
civilized
 

missionaries


rivals

 
wilderness
 

existence

 

mankind

 

plodded

 
achieved
 

continent

 
planted
 

leaving

 

interior


giving

 

crests

 

Alleghanies

 

patient

 

gallantry

 

explorers

 

France

 
Nations
 

Illinois

 

occupants


Sometimes
 
Hurons
 

solitude

 
returned
 
mountain
 
forest
 

prairie

 

invaders

 

parties

 

declared