FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   176   177   178   179   180   181   182   183   184   185   186   187   188   189   190   191   192   193   194   195   196   197   198   199   200  
201   202   203   204   205   206   207   208   209   210   211   212   213   214   215   216   217   218   219   220   221   222   223   224   225   >>   >|  
asi-existence, in which above all other things, hopes, ambitions, emotions, motivations, stands Attempt to Positivize: that we are here considering an attempt to systematize that is sheer fanaticism in its disregard of the unsystematizable--that it represented the highest good in the 19th century--that it is mono-mania, but heroic mono-mania that was quasi-divine in the 19th century-- But that this isn't the 19th century. As a doubly sponsored Brahmin--in the regard of Baptists--the objects of July 29, 1878, stand out and proclaim themselves so that nothing but disregard of the intensity of mono-mania can account for their reception by the system: Or the total eclipse of July 29, 1878, and the reports by Prof. Watson, from Rawlins, Wyoming, and by Prof. Swift, from Denver, Colorado: that they had seen two shining objects at a considerable distance from the sun. It's quite in accord with our general expression: not that there is an Intra-Mercurial planet, but that there are different bodies, many vast things; near this earth sometimes, near the sun sometimes; orbitless worlds, which, because of scarcely any data of collisions, we think of as under navigable control--or dirigible super-constructions. Prof. Watson and Prof. Swift published their observations. Then the disregard that we cannot think of in terms of ordinary, sane exclusions. The text-book systematists begin by telling us that the trouble with these observations is that they disagree widely: there is considerable respectfulness, especially for Prof. Swift, but we are told that by coincidence these two astronomers, hundreds of miles apart, were illuded: their observations were so different-- Prof. Swift (_Nature_, Sept. 19, 1878): That his own observation was "in close approximation to that given by Prof. Watson." In the _Observatory_, 2-161, Swift says that his observations and Watson's were "confirmatory of each other." The faithful try again: That Watson and Swift mistook stars for other bodies. In the _Observatory_, 2-193, Prof. Watson says that he had previously committed to memory all stars near the sun, down to the seventh magnitude-- And he's damned anyway. How such exclusions work out is shown by Lockyer (_Nature_, Aug. 20, 1878). He says: "There is little doubt that an Intra-Mercurial planet has been discovered by Prof. Watson." That was before excommunication was pronounced. He says: "If it will fit one of
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   176   177   178   179   180   181   182   183   184   185   186   187   188   189   190   191   192   193   194   195   196   197   198   199   200  
201   202   203   204   205   206   207   208   209   210   211   212   213   214   215   216   217   218   219   220   221   222   223   224   225   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

Watson

 

observations

 

disregard

 

century

 

considerable

 

Observatory

 

Nature

 

bodies

 

planet

 

Mercurial


exclusions

 

things

 

objects

 
emotions
 

illuded

 

motivations

 
ambitions
 
approximation
 

stands

 

observation


trouble

 

Attempt

 
telling
 

systematists

 

disagree

 

widely

 

astronomers

 

hundreds

 

confirmatory

 

coincidence


respectfulness

 

Lockyer

 

discovered

 

pronounced

 

excommunication

 

existence

 

previously

 

committed

 

mistook

 

faithful


Positivize

 

memory

 

damned

 
seventh
 

magnitude

 

Colorado

 

Denver

 

Rawlins

 
Wyoming
 
shining