FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   188   189   190   191   192   193   194   195   196   197   198   199   200   201   202   203   204   205   206   207   208   209   210   211   212  
213   214   215   216   217   218   219   220   221   222   223   224   225   226   227   228   229   230   231   232   233   234   235   236   237   >>   >|  
ootnote 160: Messrs. Myers and Forbes found this red clay on the Negro, most abundantly near Barcellos; also in small quantities on the Orinoco above Maipures. The officers of the "Morona" assured us that the same formation was traceable far up the Ucayali and Huallaga. This clay from the Amazon, as examined microscopically by Prof. H. James Clark, contains fragments of gasteropod shells and bivalve casts. The red earth of the Pampas, according to Ehrenberg, contains eight fresh-water to one salt-water animalcule.] [Footnote 161: "On the South American coast, where tertiary and supra-tertiary beds have been extensively elevated, I repeatedly noticed that the uppermost beds were formed of coarser materials than the lower; this appears to indicate that, as the sea becomes shallower, the force of the waves or currents increased."--Darwin's _Observations_, pt. ii., 131. "Nowhere in the Pampas is there any appearance of much superficial denudation."--Pt. iii., 100.] It is a question to what period this great accumulation is to be assigned. Humboldt called it "Old Red Sandstone;" Martius pronounced it "New Red;" Agassiz says "Drift"--the glacial deposit brought down from the Andes and worked over by the melting of the ice which transported it.[162] The Professor farther declares that "these deposits are fresh-water deposits; they show no sign of a marine origin; no sea-shells nor remains of any marine animal have as yet been found throughout their whole extent; tertiary deposits have never been observed in any part of the Amazonian basin." This was true up to 1867. Neither Bates, Wallace, nor Agassiz found any marine fossil on the banks of the great river. But there is danger in building a theory on negative evidence. These explorers ascended no farther than Tabatinga. Two hundred miles west of that fort is the little Peruvian village of Pebas, at the confluence of the Ambiyacu. We came down the Napo and Maranon, and stopped at this place. Here we discovered a fossiliferous bed intercalated between the variegated clays so peculiar to the Amazon. _It was crowded with marine tertiary shells!_ This was Pebas _vs_. Cambridge. It was unmistakable proof that the formation was not drift, but tertiary; not of fresh, but salt water origin. The species, as determined by W.M. Gabb, Esq., of Philadelphia, are: _Neritina pupa, Turbonilla minuscula_, _Mesalia Ortoni_, _Tellina Amazonenis_, _Pachydon obliqua_, and _P. tenua_.[163] All of
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   188   189   190   191   192   193   194   195   196   197   198   199   200   201   202   203   204   205   206   207   208   209   210   211   212  
213   214   215   216   217   218   219   220   221   222   223   224   225   226   227   228   229   230   231   232   233   234   235   236   237   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

tertiary

 

marine

 

shells

 

deposits

 
Amazon
 

Pampas

 

origin

 
Agassiz
 

farther

 
formation

Professor

 
animal
 

fossil

 

ascended

 
danger
 

transported

 

explorers

 

evidence

 

building

 

theory


negative

 

Wallace

 

Amazonian

 
observed
 

extent

 

declares

 
Neither
 

remains

 

determined

 

Philadelphia


species

 

Cambridge

 

unmistakable

 

Neritina

 
obliqua
 

Pachydon

 
Amazonenis
 

minuscula

 

Turbonilla

 
Mesalia

Ortoni

 

Tellina

 
crowded
 

peculiar

 
confluence
 

village

 
Ambiyacu
 
Peruvian
 

hundred

 
Maranon