FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   177   178   179   180   181   182   183   184   185   186   187   188   189   190   191   192   193   194   195   196   197   198   199   200   201  
202   203   204   205   206   207   208   209   210   211   212   213   214   215   216   217   218   219   220   221   222   223   224   225   226   >>   >|  
4.44 seconds | |Shortest Individual Period 1.60 seconds | |Average five shortest Individual Periods 1.65 seconds | |Average ten shortest Individual Periods 1.80 seconds | |Average Entire 100 Calls 3.160 seconds | |Hourly Rate at which calls were being handled 1139 | +-----------------------------------------------------------------+ Owing to the difficulty of securing accurate traffic data by means of a stop watch, an automatic, electrical timing device, capable of registering seconds and hundredths of a second, has been used in studying the performance of this system in regular operation at Ashtabula Harbor. The operators were not informed that the records were being taken, and the data tabulated represents the work of two operators in handling regular subscribers' calls. The figures in Table XI are given by C. H. North as representing the total time consumed by the operator from the time her line lamp was lighted until her work in connection with the call was finished, and it included, therefore, the pressing of the listening button, the receiving of the number from the subscriber, repeating it back to him, setting up the connection on the keys, and pressing the starting key. It will be seen that the average time for each 100 calls is quite uniform and is slightly over three seconds. The considerable variation in the individual calls, ranging from a maximum of 12.40 seconds down to a minimum of 1.60 seconds, is due almost entirely to the difference between the subscribers in the speed with which they can give their numbers. These figures indicate that, in each of the tests, calls were being handled at the rate of more than one thousand per hour by each operator. The test of the subscriber's waiting time, _i. e._, the time that he waited for the operator to answer, for one hundred calls made without the knowledge of the operator, showed the results as given in Table XII, in which a split second stop watch was used in making the observations. TABLE XII Subscribers' Waiting Time +----------------------------------------------------------+ |Number of Calls Tested 100 | |Longest Individual Period 5.20 seconds | |Average 5 Longest Individual Periods 4.64 seconds | |Average 10 Longest Individual Periods 3.80 seconds | |Shortest Indi
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   177   178   179   180   181   182   183   184   185   186   187   188   189   190   191   192   193   194   195   196   197   198   199   200   201  
202   203   204   205   206   207   208   209   210   211   212   213   214   215   216   217   218   219   220   221   222   223   224   225   226   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

seconds

 
Individual
 

Average

 
operator
 

Periods

 

Longest

 

Shortest

 

pressing

 

connection

 

operators


regular

 

subscriber

 
handled
 

shortest

 

Period

 

subscribers

 
figures
 

difference

 
ranging
 

considerable


variation
 

uniform

 

slightly

 

individual

 

average

 

minimum

 

maximum

 

waiting

 

making

 

observations


results

 

showed

 

knowledge

 
Subscribers
 
Tested
 

Waiting

 

Number

 
hundred
 

answer

 

thousand


numbers

 

waited

 

hundredths

 

registering

 

capable

 
timing
 

device

 
studying
 

performance

 

Harbor