FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   27   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45   46   47   48   49   50   51  
52   53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   65   66   67   68   69   70   71   72   73   74   75   76   >>   >|  
ness and it is impossible to dissociate the eating of chestnuts from the possibilities. At the same time it is not possible to show that chestnuts were the cause of the trouble rather than something else which was taken at the same time. THE SECRETARY: I wrote to the physician near Hartford whose wife is reported to have died, but I have had no answer. DR. METCALF: After following those cases up and finding that chestnuts could not be excluded as a possible cause, we have started experiments with various animals, also some chemical, to determine if there is any possibility of any definite toxic substance in the nuts; so far results are negligible. We are not prepared to say whether there is anything in chestnut poisoning or whether there is not. THE SECRETARY: I think there are three points in relation to the chestnut blight of very great importance to the practical nut grower, and I would like Professor Collins to answer these questions. In the first place, how far are we justified in recommending planting of non-immune varieties within the blighted area, in limited quantities, with the understanding that there is a fair show of keeping them tolerably free from the blight by watchful care and cutting out? Mr. Roberts of New Jersey has a large chestnut orchard and he says he is not afraid of the blight. He has had a large crop of chestnuts this year, and he says that, while he has cut out, I believe, one orchard of small trees his large bearing trees are not seriously affected by the blight. This is the same testimony that we had from Colonel Sober last year. The second question is, how far are we justified in recommending the planting of chestnuts outside of the present blighted area? It seems to me this is a very important point. Can we go so far outside the present blight area, perhaps beyond the present range of the chestnut tree, that we can hope to plant them without their being exposed to danger, or much danger, of contagion from the blight? Can we recommend their being planted in places where the chestnut does not grow now perhaps within several hundred miles? And the third question is in regard to immune varieties. How far has the immune quality of any varieties been demonstrated? PROFESSOR COLLINS: With regard to the first question,--planting of non-immune varieties within the chestnut disease area,--I don't feel like recommending it except on an experimental basis. Perhaps I am recommending somet
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   27   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45   46   47   48   49   50   51  
52   53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   65   66   67   68   69   70   71   72   73   74   75   76   >>   >|  



Top keywords:
chestnut
 

blight

 

chestnuts

 

immune

 
varieties
 

recommending

 
question
 

present

 
planting
 
orchard

danger

 

blighted

 

regard

 

answer

 

SECRETARY

 
justified
 
Jersey
 

afraid

 

testimony

 
bearing

affected

 

Colonel

 

demonstrated

 

PROFESSOR

 

COLLINS

 

quality

 

hundred

 

disease

 
Perhaps
 
experimental

Roberts

 
important
 

places

 

planted

 

recommend

 

exposed

 

contagion

 
METCALF
 

reported

 
started

experiments

 

animals

 

excluded

 
finding
 
trouble
 

possibilities

 

eating

 

impossible

 

dissociate

 

physician