that the result would be that the atmosphere in the districts
where such works are situated would be considerably improved, and,
consequently, that vegetation would have a better chance in the
struggle for existence, and the sanitary conditions of human dwellings
would be advanced. In all these respects the act has been a success.
But perhaps the most notable result is the effect which the act and
those which have preceded it have had upon the manufactures which they
control.
This was not anticipated by manufacturers, but now one of the
principal of them (Mr. A. M. Chance) has stated that "Government
inspection has not only led to material improvement in the general
management of chemical works, but it has also been in reality a
distinct benefit to, rather than a tax upon, the owners of such
works."
This expression of opinion is substantiated by the chief inspector
under the act, whose report for last year has recently been laid
before the local government board.
There are 1,057 works in the United Kingdom which are visited by the
inspectors, and in only two of these during 1888 did the neglect to
carry out the inspectors' warnings become so flagrant as to call for
legal interference; viz., in the case of Thomas Farmer & Co.
(limited), Victoria Docks, E., who were fined 20l. and costs for
failing to use the "best practicable means" for preventing the escape
of acid gas from manure plant; and in the case of Joseph Fison & Co.,
Bramford, who were fined 50l. and costs for excessive escape of acid
gas from sulphuric acid plant. There were seven other cases, but these
were simply for failure to register under the act.
It is very evident, therefore, that from a public point of view the
act is splendidly successful, and from the practical or scientific
side it is no less satisfactory.
Of the total number of chemical works (1,057) 866 are registered in
England, 131 in Scotland, and 44 in Ireland--a decrease in the case of
Scotland of 8, and in Ireland of 2 from the previous year, while
England has increased by 1. This must not, however, be taken as a sign
of diminished production, because there is a tendency for the larger
works to increase in size and for the smaller ones to close their
operations. The principal nuisances which the inspectors have to
prevent are the escape of hydrochloric acid gas from alkali works and
of sulphurous gas from vitriol and manure works.
The alkali act forbids the manufacturer to all
|