FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   229   230   231   232   233   234   235   236   237   238   239   240   241   242   243   244   245   246   247   248   249   250   251   252   253  
254   255   256   257   258   259   260   261   262   263   264   265   266   267   268   269   270   271   272   273   274   275   276   277   278   >>   >|  
Public schools under inspection 3 Public schools not under inspection 4 The reader wonders why four schools are neglected and which particular schools they are. Let the next table read: EXAMINATION Total registration in all schools 1500 Number of children examined 500 Number of children not examined 1000 Parents begin to wonder whether or not their children were examined, and why the taxes spent for school examination of all children go to one third of the children. The next table arrests attention: TREATMENT Number needing treatment 200 Number known to have been treated 50 Number not known to have been treated 150 We ask, at once, if examination is worth while, and if treatment really corrects the defects, saves the pupil's time and teacher's time, discovers many defects; and we want to find out whether the one hundred and fifty reported not treated have since been attended to. [Illustration: PUPIL'S RECORD] [Illustration: DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH CITY OF NEW YORK REPORT] Again, if three out of five of those examined need treatment, people will wonder whether among the thousand not examined there is the same proportion--three out of five, or six hundred--who have some trouble that needs attention. Having begun to wonder, they will ask questions, and will expect the board of health or the school physicians to see that the questions are answered. As has been proved in New York, taxpayers and the press will go farther and will demand that the annual budget provide for making general next year the benefits found to result last year from a test of health policies. The story of the prevalence of contagious diseases in school children could be told by a table such as is now in use by New York's department of health: TABLE XII PREVALENCE OF CONTAGIOUS DISEASES IN SCHOOL CHILDREN (Case rate schools) KEY: A: In School B: Among Absentee =========+========================================+====================== | | COMMUNICABLE | GENERAL COMMUNICABLE DISEASES[1] | DISEASES OF EYE SCHOOL | | AND SKIN[2] +----------------------------------------+----------+----------- | NUMBER | | | +----------+-----------+-----+
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   229   230   231   232   233   234   235   236   237   238   239   240   241   242   243   244   245   246   247   248   249   250   251   252   253  
254   255   256   257   258   259   260   261   262   263   264   265   266   267   268   269   270   271   272   273   274   275   276   277   278   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

schools

 

children

 

examined

 

Number

 

DISEASES

 
school
 

treated

 

treatment

 
health
 

attention


questions
 
Illustration
 

defects

 

examination

 
hundred
 

SCHOOL

 

inspection

 

COMMUNICABLE

 

Public

 
annual

demand

 

farther

 
budget
 

general

 

benefits

 

GENERAL

 
making
 

provide

 
physicians
 
expect

Having

 

answered

 
NUMBER
 

proved

 

taxpayers

 

CHILDREN

 

PREVALENCE

 

CONTAGIOUS

 

department

 
policies

Absentee

 

prevalence

 

diseases

 

School

 

contagious

 
result
 

RECORD

 

arrests

 

TREATMENT

 
needing