FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   402   403   404   405   406   407   408   409   410   411   412   413   414   415   416   417   418   419   420   421   422   423   424   425   426  
427   428   429   430   431   432   433   434   435   436   437   438   439   440   441   442   443   444   445   446   447   448   449   450   451   >>   >|  
g the tract which his executors had bought for them in Mercer County and had to be scattered elsewhere in the state;[55] in Connecticut the citizens of New Haven resolved in a public meeting in 1831 that a projected college for negroes in that place would not be tolerated, and shortly afterward the townsmen of Canterbury broke up the school which Prudence Crandall attempted to establish there for colored girls. The legislatures of various Northern states, furthermore, excluded free immigrants as well as discriminating sharply against those who were already inhabitants. Wherever the negroes clustered numerously, from Boston to Philadelphia and Cincinnati, they were not only brow-beaten and excluded from the trades but were occasionally the victims of brutal outrage whether from mobs or individual persecutors.[56] [Footnote 51: Frances Anne Kemble, _Journal_ (London, 1863), p. 7.] [Footnote 52: Marshall Hall, _The Two-fold Slavery of the United States_ (London, 1854), p. 17.] [Footnote 53: _Seaboard Slave States_, p. 636.] [Footnote 54: _Ibid_., p. 104.] [Footnote 55: F.U. Quillin, _The Color Line in Ohio_ (Ann Arbor, Mich.), p. 20; _Plantation and Frontier_, II, 143.] [Footnote 56: J.P. Gordy, _Political History of the United States_ (New York, 1902), II, 404, 405; John Daniels, _In Freedom's Birthplace_ (Boston, 1914), pp. 25-29; E.R. Turner, _The Negro in Pennsylvania_ (Washington, 1911), pp. 143-168, 195-204, containing many details; F.U. Quillin, _The Color Line in Ohio_, pp. 11-87; C.G. Woodson, "The Negroes of Cincinnati Prior to the Civil War," in the _Journal of Negro History_, I, 1-22; N.D. Harris, _Negro Slavery in Illinois_ (Chicago, 1906), pp. 226-240.] In the South, on the other hand, the laws were still more severe but the practice of the white people was much more kindly. Racial antipathy was there mitigated by the sympathetic tie of slavery which promoted an attitude of amiable patronage even toward the freedmen and their descendants.[57] The tone of the memorials in which many Southern townsmen petitioned for legal exemptions to permit specified free negroes to remain in their communities[58] found no echo from the corresponding type of commonplace unromantic citizens of the North. A few Southern petitions were of a contrasting tenor, it is true, one for example presented to the city council of Atlanta in 1859: "We feel aggrieved as Southern citizens that your honorable body tolerates a negr
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   402   403   404   405   406   407   408   409   410   411   412   413   414   415   416   417   418   419   420   421   422   423   424   425   426  
427   428   429   430   431   432   433   434   435   436   437   438   439   440   441   442   443   444   445   446   447   448   449   450   451   >>   >|  



Top keywords:
Footnote
 

citizens

 

States

 

negroes

 

Southern

 

Cincinnati

 

excluded

 
United
 

History

 
Slavery

London

 

Quillin

 

Journal

 

Boston

 

townsmen

 
Atlanta
 

council

 
Illinois
 

presented

 

Chicago


Harris

 
Washington
 

Pennsylvania

 

Turner

 

tolerates

 

honorable

 

Woodson

 
Negroes
 

aggrieved

 

details


memorials
 

unromantic

 
descendants
 

patronage

 

freedmen

 

commonplace

 

petitioned

 

communities

 

remain

 

exemptions


permit

 

amiable

 

attitude

 
practice
 
people
 

severe

 
kindly
 

Racial

 

promoted

 

slavery