FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   448   449   450   451   452   453   454   455   456   457   458   459   460   461   462   463   464   465   466   467   468   469   470   471   472  
473   474   475   476   477   478   479   480   481   482   483   484   485   486   487   488   489   >>  
ety." [101] [Footnote 101: _Federal Union_ (Milledgeville, Ga.), Aug. 21, 1860, quoting the Nashville _Union_.] On the whole it is hardly possible to gauge precisely the degree of popular apprehension in the premises. John Randolph was doubtless more picturesque than accurate when he said, "the night bell never tolls for fire in Richmond that the mother does not hug the infant more closely to her bosom."[102] The general trend of public expressions laid emphasis upon the need of safeguards but showed confidence that no great disasters were to be feared. The revolts which occurred and the plots which were discovered were sufficiently serious to produce a very palpable disquiet from time to time, and the rumors were frequent enough to maintain a fairly constant undertone of uneasiness. The net effect of this was to restrain that progress of liberalism which the consideration of economic interest, the doctrines of human rights and the spirit of kindliness all tended to promote. [Footnote 102: H.A. Garland, _Life of John Randolph_, I, 295.] CHAPTER XXIII THE FORCE OF THE LAW In many lawyers' briefs and court decisions it has been said that slavery could exist only by force of positive legislation.[1] This is not historically valid, for in virtually every American community where it existed at all, the institution was first established by custom alone and was merely recognized by statutes when these came to be enacted. Indeed the chief purpose of the laws was to give sanction and assurance to the racial and industrial adjustments already operative. [Footnote 1: The source of this error lies doubtless in Lord Mansfield's famous but fallacious decision of 1772 in the Somerset case, which is recorded in Howell's _State Trials_, XX, Sec. 548. That decision is well criticized in T.R.R. Cobb, _An Inquiry into the Law of Negro Slavery in the United States of America_ (vol. I, all published, Philadelphia and Savannah, 1858), pp. 163-175. Cobb's treatise, though dealing with slaves as persons only and not as property, is the best of the general analyses of the legal phase of the slaveholding regime. A briefer survey is in the _Cyclopedia of Law and Procedure_, William Mack ed., XXXVI (New York, 1910), 465-495. The works of G.M. Stroud, _A Sketch of the Laws Relating to Slavery in the Several States_ (Philadelphia, 1827), and William Goodell, _The American Slave Code in Theory and Practice_ (New York, 1853), ar
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   448   449   450   451   452   453   454   455   456   457   458   459   460   461   462   463   464   465   466   467   468   469   470   471   472  
473   474   475   476   477   478   479   480   481   482   483   484   485   486   487   488   489   >>  



Top keywords:
Footnote
 

American

 

general

 

Philadelphia

 

decision

 

Slavery

 

William

 
States
 

doubtless

 
Randolph

Theory

 

operative

 

source

 

Practice

 

racial

 
industrial
 

adjustments

 
famous
 

fallacious

 

Goodell


Mansfield

 
Somerset
 

Howell

 

recorded

 

established

 

custom

 

institution

 
community
 

existed

 

recognized


purpose
 

Trials

 
sanction
 

Indeed

 

statutes

 

enacted

 

assurance

 

dealing

 

slaves

 

persons


treatise

 

Savannah

 

property

 
survey
 
briefer
 

Cyclopedia

 
Procedure
 

regime

 

slaveholding

 

analyses