FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   407   408   409   410   411   412   413   414   415   416   417   418   419   420   421   422   423   424   425   426   427   428   429   430   431  
432   433   434   435   436   437   438   439   440   441   442   443   444   445   446   447   448   449   450   451   452   453   454   455   456   >>   >|  
nd outer concrete blocks, were the regular form of superstructure adopted. The breakwater for the extension of the harbour at Naples provides an interesting example of this change of design. A solid superstructure, formed of large concrete blocks capped with masonry, about 50 ft. wide at the base, is laid on a high rubble mound at a depth of 31 ft. below mean sea-level, and provides a quay on the top, 24-1/2 ft. wide, protected on the sea side by a promenade wall, 10 ft. high and 12-1/2 ft. wide at the top, raised 19-2/3 ft. above sea-level (fig. 12). In view of the increased depth at which superstructures are now founded upon rubble mounds, causing the breakwaters to approximate more and more to the upright-wall type, it might seem at first sight that the rubble base might be dispensed with, and the superstructure founded directly on the bed of the sea. Two circumstances, however, still render the composite form of breakwater indispensable in certain cases: (1) the great depth into which breakwaters have sometimes to extend, reaching about 56 ft. below low water at Peterhead, and 102 ft. below mean sea-level at Naples; and (2) the necessity, where the sea-bottom is soft or liable: to be eroded by scour, of interposing a wide base between the upright superstructure and the bed of the sea. [Illustration: FIG. 12.--Naples Harbor Extension Breakwater.] The injuries to which composite breakwaters appear to have been specially subject must be attributed to the greater exposure and depth of the sites in which they have been frequently constructed, as compared with rubble mounds or upright walls. The latter types, indeed, are not well suited for erection in deep water, in the first case, on account of the very large quantity of materials required for a high mound with flat slopes, and in the second, owing to the increased pressure of air under which divers have to work in laying blocks for an upright wall in deep water. The ample depth in which superstructures are founded, the due protection afforded to their outer toe, the adoption of the sloping-block system for their construction, and the dispensing in most cases with a high sheltering wall on the sea side of the superstructure, render modern superstructures as stable as upright-wall breakwaters of similar height. Nevertheless, superstructures require to be given a greater thickness than similar upri
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   407   408   409   410   411   412   413   414   415   416   417   418   419   420   421   422   423   424   425   426   427   428   429   430   431  
432   433   434   435   436   437   438   439   440   441   442   443   444   445   446   447   448   449   450   451   452   453   454   455   456   >>   >|  



Top keywords:
superstructure
 

upright

 

rubble

 

superstructures

 

breakwaters

 

founded

 
Naples
 
blocks
 

mounds

 
breakwater

increased

 

greater

 
concrete
 

render

 

composite

 

similar

 

suited

 

adoption

 
compared
 
system

dispensing

 

constructed

 
construction
 
injuries
 

Breakwater

 

Harbor

 

Extension

 
specially
 

subject

 

exposure


attributed

 

frequently

 

pressure

 

Nevertheless

 
require
 

divers

 
height
 

afforded

 
laying
 

slopes


stable

 

sheltering

 

account

 
protection
 

quantity

 

materials

 

sloping

 

required

 

thickness

 
modern