g out this morning to dine here with Mr. Grattan, I saw at his
house the poor lame boy that gives you this: he was a servant to a
plow-man near Lusk, and while he was following the plow, a dog bit him
in the leg, about eleven weeks ago. One Mrs. Price endeavored six weeks
to cure him, but could not, and his Master would maintain him no
longer. Mr. Grattan and I are of opinion that he may be a proper object
to be received into Dr. Stephen's Hospital. The boy tells his story
naturally, and Mr. Grattan and I took pity of him. If you find him
curable, and it be not against the rules of the Hospitall, I hope you
will receive him.

I am, Sir,
Your most humble Servt.
JONATH. SWIFT.

II.

_The Rev. Thomas Baker to Mr. Humphry Wanley_.

[Harl. MS. 3778, Art. 43. _Orig_.]

Cambridge, Oct. 16th [1718].

Worthy Sir

I am glad to hear Mrs. Elstob is in a condition to pay her debts, for
me she may be very easy: tho' I could wish for the sake of the
University (tho' I am no way engaged, having taken up my obligation)
that you could recover the Book, or at least could find where it is
lodged, that Mr. Brook may know where to demand it. This, I presume,
may be done.

If you have met with Books printed by Guttenberg, you have made a great
discovery. I thought there had been none such in the world, and began
to look upon Fust as the first Printer. I have seen the Bishop of Ely's
Catholicon (now with us), which, for aught I know, may have been
printed by Guttenberg; for tho' it be printed at Ments, yet there is no
name of the Printer, and the character is more rude than Fust's
Tullie's Offices, whereof there are two Copies in 1465 and 1466, the
first on vellum, the other on paper.

May I make a small enquiry, after the mention of so great a name as
Guttenberg? I remember, you told me, my Lord Harley had two Copies of
Edw. the Sixth's first Common Prayer Book. Do you remember whether
either of them be printed by Grafton, the King's Printer? I have seen
four or five Editions by Whitchurch, but never could meet with any by
Grafton, except one in my custody, which I shall look upon to be a
great Rarity, if it be likewise wanting to my Lord's Collection. It
varies from all the other Copies, and is printed in 1548. All the rest,
I think, in 1549. One reason of my enquiry is, because I