FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   42   43   44   45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52   53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   65   66  
67   68   >>  
en written by a Scotchman, or at least one very familiar with Scotland, which at that time he was not; even the letter accompanying the third part of _Christabel_ is dated from Glasgow, and though this would in itself prove nothing, the circumstances above mentioned, as well as Dr. Moir's evidence as to the time when Maginn's contributions to _Blackwood_ commenced, seems strongly presumptive against his claim. Some of the earliest and most distinguished writers in _Blackwood_ are still alive, and could, no doubt, clear up this point at once, if so inclined. J. S. WARDEN. _Attainment of Majority_ (Vol. viii., pp. 198. 250.).--In my last communication upon this subject I produced undeniable authority to prove that the law did not regard the fraction of a day; this, I think, A. E. B. will admit. The question is, now, does the day on which a man attains his majority commence at six o'clock A.M., or at midnight? We must remember that we are dealing with a question of _English_ law; and therefore the evidence of an English decision will, I submit, be stronger proof of the latter mode of reckoning than the only positive proof with which A. E. B. has defended Ben Jonson's use of the former, viz. _Roman_. In a case tried in Michaelmas Term, 1704, Chief Justice Holt said: "It has been adjudged that if one be born the 1st of February at eleven at night, and the last of January in the twenty-first year of his age at one o'clock in the morning, he makes his will of lands and dies, it is a good will, for he was then of age."--_Salkeld_, 44.; _Raymond_, 480, 1096; 1 _Siderfin_, 162. In this case, therefore, the testator was accounted of age forty-six hours before the completion of his twenty-first year. Now, the law not regarding the fraction of a day, the above case, I submit, clearly proves that the day, as regards the attainment of majority, began at midnight. RUSSELL GOLE. _Lord Halifax and Mrs. C. Barton_ (Vol. viii., pp. 429. 543.).--In answer to J. W. J.'s Query, I beg to state that I have in my possession a codicil of Mrs. Conduit's will in her own hand, dated 26th of January, 1737. This document refers to some theological tracts by Sir Isaac Newton, in his handwriting, which I have. On referring to the pedigree of the Barton family, I find that Colonel Robert Barton married Catherine Greenwood, whose father lived at Rotterdam, and was ancestor of Messrs. Greenwood, army agents. His issue were
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   42   43   44   45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52   53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   65   66  
67   68   >>  



Top keywords:

Barton

 

fraction

 

Greenwood

 
majority
 

twenty

 

January

 

submit

 
midnight
 

English

 

question


Blackwood

 

evidence

 
Rotterdam
 

family

 

Salkeld

 
pedigree
 

testator

 

Siderfin

 

referring

 

Raymond


February
 

eleven

 
adjudged
 

Robert

 

Colonel

 

morning

 

Catherine

 

father

 
married
 

accounted


Newton
 

document

 

answer

 

Justice

 
Halifax
 

refers

 

Messrs

 

Conduit

 
codicil
 

possession


completion

 

agents

 

handwriting

 

ancestor

 
RUSSELL
 

theological

 

tracts

 

proves

 
attainment
 

earliest