FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   120   121   122   123   124   125   126   127   128   129   130   131   132   133   134   135   136   137   138   139   140   141   142   143   144  
145   146   147   148   149   150   151   152   153   154   155   156   157   158   159   160   161   162   163   164   165   166   167   168   169   >>   >|  
f the strongest convictions of the human mind.[125] The conception of Infinite Being contains the positive element of _being_, abstraction being made of all _limitation_ or _bounds_. That this is a real, legitimate, and useful conception, we have no disposition to deny; we cannot divest ourselves of it; it springs up spontaneously from the innermost fountain of thought. But we cannot accept the account which Spinoza has given of its nature and origin, and still less can we assent to the application which he has made of it. He describes it as the idea of absolute, necessary, self-existent, eternal Being; and he traces its origin, not to the combined influence of experience and abstraction, acting under the great primitive law of _causality_, but to an immediate perception, or direct _intuition, of reason_. Now, we submit that the concept of _being_, and the concept of absolute _self-existent being_, are perfectly distinct from each other, and that they spring from different laws of thought. The concept of _being_ applies to everything that exists, without reference to the cause or manner of its existence; and this springs simply from experience and abstraction. The concept of _self-existent being_, which is equally suggested by the laws of our mental constitution, does not apply to everything that exists, but only to that whose existence is not originated or determined by any other being; and this concept springs also from experience and abstraction, combined, however, with the law or principle of _causality_, which teaches us that no change can occur in Nature, and that nothing can ever come into being, _without a cause_, and prompts us to infer from _the fact of existence now_, the conclusion that _something must have existed from all eternity_. The origin of each of these concepts may thus be naturally accounted for by the known laws of our mental constitution, without having recourse to any faculty of _intellectual intuition_ such as Spinoza describes,--a faculty independent of experience, and superior to it,--a faculty which gazes direct on Absolute Being, and penetrates, without the aid of any intermediate sign or manifestation, into the very essence of God. Spinoza has not discriminated aright between these two concepts, in respect either of their nature or their origin. He has not overlooked, indeed, the distinction, between _abstract ideas_ and the _intellectual intuitions_, of which he speaks; but he confounds th
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   120   121   122   123   124   125   126   127   128   129   130   131   132   133   134   135   136   137   138   139   140   141   142   143   144  
145   146   147   148   149   150   151   152   153   154   155   156   157   158   159   160   161   162   163   164   165   166   167   168   169   >>   >|  



Top keywords:
concept
 

abstraction

 
origin
 

experience

 
Spinoza
 

springs

 

existence

 
existent
 

faculty

 

absolute


exists
 

describes

 

direct

 

intuition

 

conception

 
concepts
 

causality

 
combined
 
intellectual
 

thought


mental

 

constitution

 

nature

 

abstract

 

conclusion

 

principle

 

teaches

 

speaks

 

Nature

 

intuitions


confounds
 

prompts

 

change

 
Absolute
 

penetrates

 

respect

 

superior

 

intermediate

 
essence
 
manifestation

discriminated

 

aright

 
independent
 

naturally

 

accounted

 

distinction

 

existed

 

eternity

 

recourse

 

overlooked