FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   1193   1194   1195   1196   1197   1198   1199   1200   1201   1202   1203   1204   1205   1206   1207   1208   1209   1210   1211   1212   1213   1214   1215   1216   1217  
1218   1219   1220   1221   1222   1223   1224   1225   1226   1227   1228   1229   1230   1231   1232   1233   1234   1235   1236   1237   1238   1239   1240   1241   1242   >>   >|  
her says (Ethic. iii, 12) that "as a child ought to live according to the direction of his tutor, so ought the concupiscible to accord with reason." Reply Obj. 1: This argument takes the term "childish" as denoting what is observed in children. It is not in this sense that the sin of intemperance is said to be childish, but by way of likeness, as stated above. Reply Obj. 2: A desire may be said to be natural in two ways. First, with regard to its genus, and thus temperance and intemperance are about natural desires, since they are about desires of food and sex, which are directed to the preservation of nature. Secondly, a desire may be called natural with regard to the species of the thing that nature requires for its own preservation; and in this way it does not happen often that one sins in the matter of natural desires, for nature requires only that which supplies its need, and there is no sin in desiring this, save only where it is desired in excess as to quantity. This is the only way in which sin can occur with regard to natural desires, according to the Philosopher (Ethic. iii, 11). There are other things in respect of which sins frequently occur, and these are certain incentives to desire devised by human curiosity [*Cf. Q. 167], such as the nice (_curiosa_) preparation of food, or the adornment of women. And though children do not affect these things much, yet intemperance is called a childish sin for the reason given above. Reply Obj. 3: That which regards nature should be nourished and fostered in children, but that which pertains to the lack of reason in them should not be fostered, but corrected, as stated above. _______________________ THIRD ARTICLE [II-II, Q. 142, Art. 3] Whether Cowardice* Is a Greater Vice Than Intemperance? [*Cf. Q. 125] Objection 1: It would seem that cowardice is a greater vice than intemperance. For a vice deserves reproach through being opposed to the good of virtue. Now cowardice is opposed to fortitude, which is a more excellent virtue than temperance, as stated above (A. 2; Q. 141, A. 8). Therefore cowardice is a greater vice than intemperance. Obj. 2: Further, the greater the difficulty to be surmounted, the less is a man to be reproached for failure, wherefore the Philosopher says (Ethic. vii, 7) that "it is no wonder, in fact it is pardonable, if a man is mastered by strong and overwhelming pleasures or pains." Now seemingly it is more difficult to control
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   1193   1194   1195   1196   1197   1198   1199   1200   1201   1202   1203   1204   1205   1206   1207   1208   1209   1210   1211   1212   1213   1214   1215   1216   1217  
1218   1219   1220   1221   1222   1223   1224   1225   1226   1227   1228   1229   1230   1231   1232   1233   1234   1235   1236   1237   1238   1239   1240   1241   1242   >>   >|  



Top keywords:
intemperance
 
natural
 

nature

 

desires

 

children

 
desire
 

regard

 

stated

 

childish

 
reason

cowardice

 

greater

 

preservation

 

fostered

 

virtue

 

opposed

 

called

 

things

 

Philosopher

 
requires

temperance
 

Whether

 

overwhelming

 
strong
 

Cowardice

 

Greater

 

pleasures

 

nourished

 

difficult

 
control

pertains

 

seemingly

 

ARTICLE

 

Intemperance

 

corrected

 

fortitude

 

reproached

 

failure

 

wherefore

 

surmounted


excellent
 

Further

 
Therefore
 

difficulty

 

pardonable

 

mastered

 

Objection

 

reproach

 

deserves

 

desired