did you want to do with the poor cat?" "kill!"
"Have you no pity?" "no!" "Then is the cat right if she kills you?"
"_no!_" "Why?" (The reply to this was rapped indistinctly.) "Have you
no pity for any man or animal?" "for dog!"...
22 April: I had told her that my brother was coming, and that he wore a
field-grey coat and was a soldier. When he arrived I said to her: "Who
is this?" "Your brother."
Next day she was asked in writing: "What did Lola see swimming in the
water?" "duck!" I had shown her a duck on the previous afternoon.
26 April: On this day Lola appeared before Professors Kraemer, Mack,
Kindermann and Ziegler, of Hohenheim, which resulted in these gentlemen
forwarding the following statement to the "Mitteilungen fuer
Tierpsychologie" ( = Communications respecting the psychology of
Animals), series 1916; Number 1, p. 11:
"EXAMINATION OF LOLA BY PROFESSORS KRAeMER, MACK, KINDERMANN AND
ZIEGLER
"In our presence Lola solved a number of sums, such as: 5 + 8 = 13.
30 + 10 - 15 = 25. 4 Mark - 1 mark 20 = 2 mark. 80.
"She next counted the number of persons present. After this,
several dots were scattered about a sheet of paper: at first she
put their number down as 19--but corrected this to 18. Lola then
told us the time: it was 4.16m., and after this she did some
spelling. When shown the picture of a flower she rapped: "blum"
(Blume = flower), and to my somewhat faulty drawing of a cat she
responded with "tir" (Tier = animal), while finally to the question
of what was the name of the Mannheim dog she replied "mein fadr"
(Vater = father)--we all having expected her to say Rolf. Then
followed the musical tests which amazed us most of all, for here
she exhibited an ability lacking in many an individual."
* * * * *
27 April: Lola very tired: groans and does everything wrong. I said:
"Are you lazy?" She replies "no." "Then why are you answering so
badly?" "go!" "Who is to go?" "_tired!_"
29 April: I asked Lola why she had not attended to me on the 22nd,
when--on a country expedition we had made together--she had insisted on
running after the game when I had called her back. I had had to hunt
after her for ten hours the next day, finding her--by the merest
chance--at a peasant's house. She had settled down there alongside of a
sheep-dog to watch the sheep, and seemed by no means pleased to see me;
usual
|