FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   23   24   25   26   27   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45   46   47  
48   49   50   51   52   53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   65   66   67   68   69   70   71   72   >>   >|  
stion of my guardian and trustee, Mr. Tuckerman Toddleham, of Barristers' Hall, Boston, to inquire whether I may not be allowed the great privilege of a desk in your office. I am a Harvard man, born in Salem, and of an old Massachusetts family. Ever since I made up my mind as a boy to enter the law it has been my ambition to study in your office; and, I may add, it is also the earnest hope of my guardian, Mr. Toddleham." "Do you refer to the Mr. Toddleham of 'Toddleham on Perpetuities'?" he asked with some interest. "The same," I answered, for although I had never heard of the work in question, it seemed just the sort for old Toddleham's production. "I am glad to know you, Mr. Quibble," he exclaimed, extending his hand. "I have often wished that I could meet your guardian and ask the great Mr. Toddleham face to face what he really thinks of the Rule in Shelley's Case--what do you think of it? What _was_ the Rule in Shelley's Case, may I ask?" Now, I had never heard of the rule in question, so for want of a better answer I replied: "The law is no respecter of person. I suppose the rule was _the same in his case as in any other_." Mr. Haight looked at me strangely for a moment and suddenly began to chuckle. Then he eyed me again and chuckled still more. Finally he laid aside all modestly and hugged himself with delight. "I see that you are a man of _esprit!_" he remarked between spasms. "I shall be glad to take you into my office. You may go and introduce yourself to Mr. Spruggins, the chief clerk." Thus it was that I secured my first slender foothold at the bar of New York, and it was not for several years that I discovered that the Toddleham who had written the book on Perpetuities was an entirely different person, belonging to another branch of the family. Of course I received no compensation for my services at Haight & Foster's, but that was the customary rule with all students. As a result we were not strictly tied down in our attendance at the office. I really believe it would have been cheaper for the firm to have paid a small salary to their clerks, for it would then have been in a position to demand much more of them in return. As it was I found myself able to come and go about as I chose, and being obliged to support myself in some way my attendance at the office was quite irregular. But I was started at last and belonged somewhere. No longer was it necessary for me to wander ab
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   23   24   25   26   27   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45   46   47  
48   49   50   51   52   53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   65   66   67   68   69   70   71   72   >>   >|  



Top keywords:
Toddleham
 

office

 
guardian
 

attendance

 
Perpetuities
 
Shelley
 
Haight
 

question

 

person

 

family


result

 

branch

 

belonging

 

compensation

 

Foster

 

students

 

Barristers

 

customary

 

services

 

received


written

 

Spruggins

 

introduce

 

secured

 
discovered
 
slender
 

foothold

 

obliged

 

support

 

irregular


longer

 
wander
 
started
 

belonged

 

trustee

 

cheaper

 

Tuckerman

 

salary

 

return

 
demand

position
 
clerks
 

strictly

 

extending

 
exclaimed
 

Quibble

 

production

 

wished

 

Massachusetts

 
Harvard