FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   176   177   178   179   180   181   182   183   184   185   186   187   188   189   190   191   192   193   194   195   196   197   198   199   200  
201   202   203   204   205   206   207   >>  
------------------------------------------------ Amongst vessels which were classed as auxiliaries the figures were: Class of | July. | Aug. | Sept. | Oct. | Nov. | Deficit in Vessel. | F | D | F | D | F | D | F | D | F | D | 5 months -------------------------------------------------------------------- Minesweepers | 5 | 3 | 4 | 4 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 7 Trawlers |25 |18 |23 |14 |30 |13 |27 |28 |33 |24 | 41 -------------------------------------------------------------------- It will be seen from these figures that the forecast of June was inaccurate even for the three succeeding months and that the total deficit in the five months was considerable, except in the case of T.B.D.'s and "P" boats. The most disappointing figures were those relating to submarines, trawlers and minesweepers. The case of the submarines may be put in another way, thus: In the June forecast twenty-six submarines were forecasted for delivery during the period July to the end of December, the dates of three, however, being somewhat uncertain; of this total of twenty-six, _only nine were actually delivered_. Of the remainder, seven were shown in a November forecast as delayed for four months, two for five months, and one for nine months. The attention of the Production Departments was continually directed to the very serious effect which the delay was producing on our anti-submarine measures, and the First Lord, Sir Eric Geddes, was informed of the difficult position which was arising. In the early part of December I pointed out to the Third Sea Lord and the Admiralty Controller, Sir Allan Anderson, that it was obviously impossible for the Naval Staff to frame future policy unless some dependence could be placed on the forecast of deliveries. The Controller in reply stated that accurate forecasts were most difficult, and proposed a discussion with the Third Sea Lord and myself, but I had left the Admiralty before the discussion took place. The delays, as will be seen from the tables given, were most serious in the case of vessels classed as auxiliaries. Sir Thomas Bell, who possessed great experience of shipbuilding in a private capacity, was at the head of the Department of the Deputy Controller for Dockyards and Shipbuilding, and the Director of Warship Production was a distinguished Naval constructor. The Deputy Controller of Auxiliary Shipbuilding was an officer lent from the War Office, whose prev
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   176   177   178   179   180   181   182   183   184   185   186   187   188   189   190   191   192   193   194   195   196   197   198   199   200  
201   202   203   204   205   206   207   >>  



Top keywords:

months

 

Controller

 

forecast

 

submarines

 
figures
 

discussion

 

Production

 
difficult
 

Admiralty

 
twenty

December

 
Shipbuilding
 

vessels

 

classed

 
auxiliaries
 

Deputy

 

Auxiliary

 

officer

 

experience

 

Anderson


Thomas

 

constructor

 

impossible

 
pointed
 

Office

 

possessed

 
measures
 

Geddes

 

informed

 

arising


position

 

future

 

policy

 

Department

 
private
 

capacity

 
delays
 

submarine

 

Dockyards

 
proposed

Warship

 

distinguished

 
dependence
 

deliveries

 
Director
 

shipbuilding

 
forecasts
 
accurate
 

stated

 
tables