FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   9   10   11   12   13   14   15   16   17   18   19   20   21   22   23   24   25   26   27   28   29   30   31   32   33  
34   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45   46   >>  
ich eventually had to be taken up, regardless of the strength of the vested interests involved. The provocation came from his claims that the product of the first stage of the conversion was the equivalent of charcoal iron, the processes following the smelting being conducted without contact with, or the use of, any mineral fuel; and that further blowing could be used to produce any quality of metal, that is, a steel with any desired percentage of carbon. Yet, the principal irritant to the complacency of the ironmaster must have been Bessemer's attack on an industry which had gone on increasing the size of its smelting furnaces, thus improving the uniformity of its pig-iron, without modifying the puddling process, which at best could handle no more than 400 to 500 pounds of iron at a time, divided into the "homeopathic doses" of 70 or 80 pounds capable of being handled by human labor.[20] Bessemer's claim to "do" 800 pounds of metal in 30 minutes against the puddling furnace's output of 500 pounds in two hours was calculated to arouse the opposition of those who feared the loss of capital invested in puddling furnaces and of those who suspected that their jobs might be in jeopardy. The ensuing criticism of Bessemer has to be interpreted, therefore, with this in mind; not by any means was it entirely based on objective consideration of the method or the product.[21] [18] Bessemer's paper was reported in _The Times_, London, August 14, 1856. By the time the Transactions of the British Association were prepared for publication, the controversy aroused by Bessemer's claim to manufacture "malleable iron and steel without fuel" had broken out and it was decided not to report the paper. Dredge (_op. cit._, footnote 15, p. 915) describes this decision as "sagacious." [19] Bessemer, _op. cit._ (footnote 7), p. 164. [20] _The Times_, London, August 14, 1856. [21] David Mushet recognized that Bessemer's great feature was this effort to "raise the after processes ... to a level commensurate with the preceding case" (_Mining Journal_, 1856, p. 599). Within a month of his address, Bessemer had sold licenses to several ironmasters (outside Sheffield) and so provided himself with capital with which to continue his development work; but he refused to sell his patents outright to the Ebbw Vale Iron Works and by this action, as will be seen, he creat
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   9   10   11   12   13   14   15   16   17   18   19   20   21   22   23   24   25   26   27   28   29   30   31   32   33  
34   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45   46   >>  



Top keywords:

Bessemer

 

pounds

 

puddling

 

London

 
August
 

furnaces

 

capital

 

smelting

 

processes

 

footnote


product

 

Dredge

 

report

 
aroused
 
controversy
 
manufacture
 

broken

 

decided

 

malleable

 

action


consideration

 

method

 

objective

 
reported
 

prepared

 

Association

 
Transactions
 
British
 

publication

 
decision

Within
 

address

 
refused
 

preceding

 
Mining
 

Journal

 

licenses

 
provided
 

development

 

Sheffield


ironmasters

 
commensurate
 

sagacious

 

continue

 
outright
 

describes

 

Mushet

 

feature

 
effort
 

recognized