FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   13   14   15   16   17   18   19   20   21   22   23   24   25   26   27   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37  
38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45   46   >>  
with notice of Robert Mushet's activity, even if he had not already observed his claims as they were presented to the Patent Office. Mushet, said the _Mining Journal_-- appears to intend to carry on his researches from the point where Mr. J. G. Martien left off and is proceeding on the Bessemer plan of patenting each idea as it occurs to his imaginative brain. He proposes to make both iron and steel but does not appear to have quite decided as to the course of action ... to accomplish his object, and therefore claims various processes, some of which are never likely to realize the inventor's expectations, although decidedly novel, whilst others are but slight modification of inventions which have already been tried and failed. [28] _Mining Journal_, 1857, vol. 27, p. 764. The contemporary attitude is reflected in another comment by the _Mining Journal_:[29] Although the application of chemical knowledge to the manufacture of malleable iron cannot fail to produce beneficial results, the quality of the metal depends more upon the mechanical than the chemical processes.... Without wishing in any way to discourage the iron chemists, we have no hesitation in giving this as our opinion which we shall maintain until the contrary be actually proved. With regard to steel, there may be a large field for chemical research ... however, we believe that unless the iron be of a nature adapted for the manufacture of steel by ordinary processes, the purely chemical inventions will only give a metal of a very uniform quality. [29] _Ibid._, p. 764. Another correspondent, William Green, was of the opinion that Mushet's "new compounds and alloys," promised well as an auxiliary to the Bessemer process but that "the evil which it was intended to remove was more visionary than real." Bessemer's chief difficulty was the phosphorus, not the oxide of iron "as Mr. Mushet assumes." This, Bessemer no doubt would deal with in due course, but meanwhile he did well "to concentrate his energies upon the steel operations," after which he would have time to tackle "the difficulties which have so far retarded the iron operations."[30] [30] _Ibid._, p. 791. Mushet[31] claims to have taken out his patent of September 22, 1856, covering the famous "triple compound," after he-- had fully ascertained, upon the ordinary scale of manufacture
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   13   14   15   16   17   18   19   20   21   22   23   24   25   26   27   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37  
38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45   46   >>  



Top keywords:

Mushet

 

Bessemer

 

chemical

 

Journal

 
processes
 

manufacture

 

Mining

 

claims

 

inventions

 

operations


ordinary

 

quality

 

opinion

 
contrary
 
maintain
 
uniform
 

correspondent

 

William

 

Another

 

purely


nature

 

research

 

Robert

 
regard
 

adapted

 

proved

 
notice
 
activity
 

retarded

 
energies

tackle
 

difficulties

 
patent
 

compound

 
ascertained
 

triple

 

famous

 
September
 

covering

 

concentrate


process

 
intended
 

remove

 

auxiliary

 
compounds
 

alloys

 

promised

 

visionary

 
assumes
 

difficulty