FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   22   23   24   25   26   27   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45   46  
>>  
firms licensed by Bessemer to make his equipment, was under way by April 1858 (see _Mining Journal_, 1858, vol. 28, p. 259). [65] _Mining Journal_, 1858, vol. 28, p. 696. Mushet commented (p. 713) that he had done the same thing "eighteen months ago." Goransson was later to claim considerable improvements on the method of introducing the blast, and, in consequence, the first effective demonstration of the Bessemer method[66]--this at a time when Bessemer was still remelting the product of his converter in crucibles, after granulating the steel in water. If Mushet is to be believed, this success of Goransson's was wholly due to his ore being "totally free from phosphorous and sulphur."[67] However, Bessemer's own progress was substantial, for his Sheffield works were reported as being in active operation in April 1859, and a price for his engineers' tool and spindle steel was included in the _Mining Journal_ "Mining Market" weekly quotations for the first time[68] on June 4, 1859. [66] Swank, _op. cit._ (footnote 42), p. 405. [67] _The Engineer_, 1859, vol. 7, p. 350. [68] _Mining Journal_, 1859, vol. 29, pp. 396 and 401. The price quotation was continued until April 1865. In May 1859 Bessemer gave a paper, his first public pronouncement since August 1856, before the Institution of Civil Engineers.[69] The early process, he admitted, had led to failure because the process had not reduced the quantity of sulphur and phosphorous, but his account is vague as to the manner in which he dealt with this problem: Steam and pure hydrogen gas were tried, with more or less success in the removal of sulphur, and various flues, composed chiefly of silicates of the oxide of iron and manganese were brought in contact with the fluid metal, during the process and the quantity of phosphorous was thereby reduced. [69] _The Engineer_, 1859, vol. 7, p. 437. But the clear implication is that the commercial operation at Sheffield was based on the use of the best Swedish pig iron and the hematite pig from Workington. The use of manganese as standard practice at this time is not referred to,[70] but the rotary converter and the use of ganister linings are mentioned for the first time. [70] Jeans, _op. cit._ (footnote 5), p. 349 refers to the hematite ores of Lancashire and Cumberland as "the ores hitherto almost exclusively used in th
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   22   23   24   25   26   27   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45   46  
>>  



Top keywords:
Mining
 

Bessemer

 

Journal

 

phosphorous

 
process
 
sulphur
 

success

 
footnote
 

converter

 

Engineer


Sheffield

 

quantity

 
reduced
 

manganese

 
operation
 
Mushet
 

hematite

 

method

 
Goransson
 

refers


manner

 

hydrogen

 

problem

 
Cumberland
 

Engineers

 
Institution
 

admitted

 

hitherto

 

account

 

exclusively


failure

 

Lancashire

 
Swedish
 

contact

 

Workington

 

brought

 
implication
 
commercial
 

standard

 

linings


removal

 

ganister

 

mentioned

 

rotary

 
practice
 

silicates

 
referred
 

chiefly

 
composed
 

effective