FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   192   193   194   195   196   197   198   199   200   201   202   203   204   205   206   207   208   209   210   211   212   213   214   215   216  
217   218   219   220   221   222   223   224   225   226   227   228   229   230   231   232   233   234   235   236   237   238   239   240   241   >>   >|  
he schools, the scholars persevered in their study; and if the king's mandate aimed at a complete discontinuance of legal instruction, his policy was signally defeated. Successive writers have credited Edward III.'s reign with the establishment of Inns of Court; and it has been erroneously inferred that the study of the Common Law not only languished, but was altogether extinct during the period of nearly one hundred years that intervened between Henry III.'s dissolution of the city schools and Edward III.'s accession. Abundant evidence, however, exists that this was not the case. Edward I., in the twentieth year of his reign, ordered his judges of the Common Pleas to "provide and ordain, from every county, certain attorneys and lawyers" (in the original "atturnatus et _apprenticiis_") "of the best and most apt for their learning and skill, who might do service to his court and people; and those so chosen, and no other should follow his court, and transact affairs therein; the words of which order make it clear that the country contained a considerable body of persons who devoted themselves to the study and practice of the law." So also in the Year-book, 1 Ed. III., the words, "et puis une apprentise demand," show that lawyers holding legal degrees existed in the very first year of Edward III.'s reign; a fact which justifies the inference that in the previous reign England contained Common Law schools capable of granting the legal degree of apprentice. Again Dugdale remarks, "In 20 Ed. III., in a _quod ei deforciat_ to an exception taken, it was answered by Sir Richard de Willoughby (then a learned justice of the _Common Pleas_) and William Skipwith, (afterwards also one of the justices of that court), that the same was no exception amongst the _Apprentices in Hostells or Inns_." Whence it is manifest that Inns of Court were institutions in full vigor at the time when they have been sometimes represented as originally established. But after their expulsion from the city, there is reason to think that the common lawyers made no attempt to reside in colleges within its boundaries. They preferred to establish themselves on spots where they could enjoy pure air and rural quietude, could surround themselves with trees and lawns, or refresh their eyes with the sight of the silver Thames. In the earliest part of the fourteenth century, they took possession of a great palace that stood on the western outskirt of the town, an
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   192   193   194   195   196   197   198   199   200   201   202   203   204   205   206   207   208   209   210   211   212   213   214   215   216  
217   218   219   220   221   222   223   224   225   226   227   228   229   230   231   232   233   234   235   236   237   238   239   240   241   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

Common

 

Edward

 
lawyers
 
schools
 

contained

 

exception

 

Dugdale

 

inference

 

Whence

 

remarks


Hostells
 

Apprentices

 

apprentice

 

institutions

 
England
 
capable
 

granting

 

degree

 

manifest

 

Skipwith


deforciat

 

Richard

 

previous

 

answered

 

Willoughby

 

William

 

justice

 

learned

 

justices

 

refresh


silver

 
surround
 

quietude

 

Thames

 

earliest

 

palace

 

western

 

outskirt

 

possession

 

fourteenth


century

 

expulsion

 

reason

 

established

 

originally

 

represented

 

justifies

 
common
 

boundaries

 

preferred