FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   216   217   218   219   220   221   222   223   224   225   226   227   228   229   230   231   232   233   234   235   236   237   238   239   240  
241   242   243   244   245   246   247   248   249   250   251   252   253   254   255   256   257   258   259   260   261   262   263   264   265   >>   >|  
the remedy diminishes, and you have only to force up taxation sufficiently high to extinguish the remedy altogether."[83] Mr. Asquith said-- "A more confused and illogical condition of things it is impossible to imagine. The House ought really to take the opportunity of threshing out the principle upon which these equivalent grants ought to be distributed between the three countries."[84] Lord St. Aldwyn said-- "That he always had a very strong objection to the system of Equivalent Grants, because when they had to make a grant for certain purposes to England, they were obliged to make proportionate grants to Ireland and Scotland quite irrespective of whether they needed them or not."[85] Neither the "Imperial" contribution basis nor the "Population" basis, which has in some instances been resorted to for grants in aid, is satisfactory, nor is the method desirable of setting aside a certain fund raised by some particular tax to finance a particular service. For instance, the subvention of Education in Ireland out of the "Whisky money" recently broke down owing to the diminution of the Revenue from this source. The more sober Ireland became, the less she got for Education. Chaos was imminent, and finally, after much friction, a special grant had to be made from the Treasury to save the situation. There are numerous instances in which great complications have been caused in dealing with local authorities owing to these methods of making grants in aid, and the system should be reformed. The true basis is the basis of each Kingdom's need.... England has her needs, let them be supplied. Scotland has hers, let them be supplied. Ireland has hers, and having regard to her present comparative poverty, let them be supplied "not grudgingly or of necessity," but by the Chancellor of the Exchequer "as a cheerful giver." This is the constitutional principle under the Act of Union, and the soundest financial principle to observe for the United Kingdom. FOOTNOTES: [Footnote 76: 56 Geo. III. c. 98.] [Footnote 77: "Hansard," Feb. 27, 1865, vol. 177, p. 813.] [Footnote 78: "Financial Relations Report," 1896, c. 8262, vol. iii. p. 194.] [Footnote 79: 1896, c. 8262, p. 194.] [Footnote 80: "Hansard," 1888, vol. 327, p. 1287.] [Footnote 81: "Parl. Deb.," vol. 332, p. 790.] [Footnote 82: Ibid., vol. 120, p. 976.] [Footnote 83: "Parl. Deb.," vol. 120, p. 823
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   216   217   218   219   220   221   222   223   224   225   226   227   228   229   230   231   232   233   234   235   236   237   238   239   240  
241   242   243   244   245   246   247   248   249   250   251   252   253   254   255   256   257   258   259   260   261   262   263   264   265   >>   >|  



Top keywords:
Footnote
 

grants

 

Ireland

 
supplied
 

principle

 

remedy

 

Education

 

Kingdom

 
system
 
England

instances

 

Scotland

 

Hansard

 

special

 

numerous

 

regard

 

present

 

situation

 

comparative

 
Treasury

complications
 

poverty

 
reformed
 

methods

 

making

 

authorities

 

caused

 
dealing
 
cheerful
 

Report


Relations
 

Financial

 

Exchequer

 

necessity

 

Chancellor

 

constitutional

 

financial

 

observe

 

United

 

FOOTNOTES


soundest

 

friction

 

grudgingly

 
subvention
 

countries

 

distributed

 

opportunity

 

threshing

 

equivalent

 

Aldwyn