FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   18   19   20   21   22   23   24   25   26   27   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42  
43   44   45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52   53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   65   66   67   >>   >|  
_Francesca_ is infinitely conscious that she is a wife; _Giovanni_ is suspicious. It would seem that Pellico's play is the first that realized the theatrical possibilities of the story; research has brought to light no play manuscript previous to his. In the handling of his details, Pellico's incongruities and artificialities are many. _Paolo_ returns from knightly deeds in Asia, to find his father dead--the _Malatesta Verucchio_ who died in 1312, twenty-seven years after _Giovanni_ committed the murder; therefore Pellico gives to the deformed brother the power that history does not wholly accord. The dramatist would avoid the indelicacy he finds in the reading incident, recounting it only in a situation during which _Francesca_ holds aloof in a wild effort to stifle her love. Throughout the play, there is this ruthless twisting, in a desire to conceal wrong and unpardonable sin. Turning to Uhland's fragmentary ideas, which even he himself was doubtful whether he could handle, an atmosphere confronts us as mediaevally German as the "Der arme Heinrich" of Hartmann von Aue, which was the inspirational source for Longfellow's "The Golden Legend." Uhland shows heaviness in conception, and a conventionality, thoroughly at variance with the tragedy's original passion. Romantic as he is, he has robbed the story of its warm southern nature, and has thrown his Dante aside to deal with false situation. He seems willing to let fact and spirit go. _Paolo_ is a knight who tilts and worships a glove. Uhland thinks, and he is not alone in his belief, that _Francesca_ had been promised to _Paolo_ before _Giovanni_ was wedded to her; yet if _Paolo's_ marriage with _Orabile_, in 1269, is to be recognized as correct, historically, logical deductions from dates would discountenance the statement. Neither have I found commentaries to support the theory that _Paolo_ was older than _Giovanni_, as Uhland sets forth in his play. The servant in Boccaccio here becomes a jealous lover. It is interesting to note the variations of this counter-element in the many play versions of the story--the element that urges _Giovanni's_ suspicion to quick action--the dramatic force of _Pepe_ in Boker; the disappointed motherhood and embittered love of _Lucrezia_ in Stephen Phillips; the inborn savagery of _Malatestino_ in D'Annunzio; the innocent unconsciousness of _Concordia_ in Crawford, which finds similarity in a scene in Maeterlinck's "Pelleas and M
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   18   19   20   21   22   23   24   25   26   27   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42  
43   44   45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52   53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   65   66   67   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

Giovanni

 
Uhland
 
Pellico
 

Francesca

 
element
 
situation
 
promised
 

thinks

 

historically

 

belief


marriage
 
recognized
 

wedded

 
correct
 
Orabile
 

knight

 
southern
 

nature

 

thrown

 

robbed


Romantic

 

variance

 

tragedy

 

original

 

passion

 

spirit

 

logical

 
worships
 
embittered
 

motherhood


Lucrezia

 

Stephen

 
Phillips
 

disappointed

 

action

 

dramatic

 

inborn

 

savagery

 

similarity

 
Maeterlinck

Pelleas

 

Crawford

 

Concordia

 

Malatestino

 
Annunzio
 

innocent

 

unconsciousness

 

suspicion

 

support

 

commentaries