FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   252   253   254   255   256   257   258   259   260   261   262   263   264   265   266   267   268   269   270   271   272   273   274   275   276  
277   278   279   280   281   282   283   284   285   286   287   288   289   290   291   292   293   294   295   296   297   298   299   300   301   >>   >|  
were practically no residents in what became the Province of Upper Canada and is now the Province of Ontario. The letter is to be found in the _Canadian Archives_, B. 217, p. 21: as no further record appears, it is to be presumed that an order was made for sale by the Sheriff. The Report of James Monk Attorney-General at Quebec about to be mentioned is to be found in the _Canadian Archives_, B. 207, p. 105. [17] In the same year a much wronged Negro petitioned Haldimand. His petition dated at Quebec, October 17, 1778, reads: "To His Excellency Frederick Haldimand, Governor & Commander in Chief of all Kanady and the territories thereunto belonging, The Petition of Joseph King humbly sheweth that Your Petitioner has been twice taken by the Yankys and sold by them each time at Public Vendue: he has made his escape and brought two white men through the woods: he was a servant to Captain McCoy last winter in Montreal and came here (Quebec) last spring. Your Petitioner has gone through many Perils and Dangers of his life for making his escape from the Yankeys. He hoaps that Your Excellency through the abundance of Your Benevolence will grant him his liberty for which your poor Petitioner as in Duty bound will ever pray." _Canadian Archives_, B. 217, p. 324. [18] In the Petition referred to _post_, Mrs. La Force states that her husband was "late of Virginia." [19] I have followed the Powell MSS. in spelling, capitalization, etc. [20] They were taken in an expedition nominally under Captain Bird but he had little control over the Indians and had only a few men of his own British Regulars. He had had bitter experience of the cruelty and unreliability of the Indians in 1779 but had to go with them in 1780. This was not one of the two large Forts which Bird took in his 1780 expedition, Fort Liberty and Martin's Station, but a smaller fortification. It was taken June 26, 1780 (_Can. Arch._, B. 172, 480); that there were several small forts is certain; that some of the prisoners brought to Detroit were from the small forts and that they (or some of them) were not rebels appears from the letter from De Peyster of August 4, 1780 (_Canadian Archives_, B. 100, p. 441): "In a former letter to the Commander in Chief," said he, "I observed that it would be dangerous having so many Prisoners here but I then thought those small Forts were occupied by a different set of people." [21] The well-known so-called Renegade, is in
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   252   253   254   255   256   257   258   259   260   261   262   263   264   265   266   267   268   269   270   271   272   273   274   275   276  
277   278   279   280   281   282   283   284   285   286   287   288   289   290   291   292   293   294   295   296   297   298   299   300   301   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

Archives

 

Canadian

 

Petitioner

 
letter
 

Quebec

 
Petition
 

Excellency

 

Captain

 

Indians

 
expedition

brought

 

escape

 

Haldimand

 

Commander

 

appears

 

Province

 

occupied

 
people
 
British
 
Regulars

unreliability

 

cruelty

 
experience
 

control

 

bitter

 

rebels

 

spelling

 
capitalization
 

Powell

 

Renegade


Detroit

 

called

 

nominally

 

prisoners

 

smaller

 

fortification

 

Station

 
observed
 

Virginia

 
Martin

Prisoners

 

thought

 

Peyster

 

August

 

dangerous

 

Liberty

 

Dangers

 

petition

 

October

 

petitioned