FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   556   557   558   559   560   561   562   563   564   565   566   567   568   569   570   571   572   573   574   575   576   577   578   579   580  
581   582   583   584   585   586   587   588   589   590   591   592   593   594   595   596   597   598   599   600   601   602   603   604   605   >>   >|  
olution in Scotland, 1690; An Account of the Proceedings of the Estates of Scotland, fol. Lond. 1689.] [Footnote 290: Balcarras's narrative exhibits both Hamilton and Athol in a most unfavourable light. See also the Life of James, ii. 338, 339.] [Footnote 291: Act. Parl. Scot., March 14. 1688/9; Balcarras's Memoirs; History of the late Revolution in Scotland; Life of James, ii. 342.] [Footnote 292: Balcarras's Memoirs; History of the late Revolution in Scotland, 1690.] [Footnote 293: Act. Parl. Scot., March 14. and 15. 1689; Balcarras's Memoirs; London Gazette, March 25.; History of the late Revolution in Scotland, 1690; Account of the Proceedings of the Estates of Scotland, 1689.] [Footnote 294: See Cleland's Poems, and the commendatory poems contained in the same volume, Edinburgh, 1697. It has been repeatedly asserted that this William Cleland was the father of William Cleland, the Commissioner of Taxes, who was well known twenty year later in the literary society of London, who rendered some not very reputable services to Pope, and whose son John was the author of an infamous book but too widely celebrated. This is an entire mistake. William Cleland, who fought at Bothwell Bridge, was not twenty-eight when he was killed in August, 1689; and William Cleland, the Commissioner of Taxes, died at sixty-seven in September, 1741. The former therefore cannot have been the father of the latter. See the Exact Narrative of the Battle of Dunkeld; the Gentleman's Magazine for 1740; and Warburton's note on the Letter to the Publisher of the Dunciad, a letter signed W. Cleland, but really written by Pope. In a paper drawn up by Sir Robert Hamilton, the oracle of the extreme Covenanters, and a bloodthirsty ruffian, Cleland is mentioned as having been once leagued with those fanatics, but afterwards a great opposer of their testimony. Cleland probably did not agree with Hamilton in thinking it a sacred duty to cut the throats of prisoners of war who had been received to quarter. See Hamilton's Letter to the Societies, Dec 7. 1685.] [Footnote 295: Balcarras's Memoirs.] [Footnote 296: Balcarras's Memoirs. But the fullest account of these proceedings is furnished by some manuscript notes which are in the library of the Faculty of Advocates. Balcarras's dates are not quite exact. He probably trusted to his memory for them. I have corrected them from the Parliamentary Records.] [Footnote 297: Act. Parl. Scot., Mar. 16. 1
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   556   557   558   559   560   561   562   563   564   565   566   567   568   569   570   571   572   573   574   575   576   577   578   579   580  
581   582   583   584   585   586   587   588   589   590   591   592   593   594   595   596   597   598   599   600   601   602   603   604   605   >>   >|  



Top keywords:
Footnote
 

Cleland

 

Balcarras

 

Scotland

 

Memoirs

 

William

 

Hamilton

 
Revolution
 

History

 
Commissioner

Proceedings

 

Estates

 

Account

 

London

 

father

 
twenty
 

Letter

 
leagued
 

fanatics

 

testimony


opposer

 
Robert
 

written

 

signed

 

letter

 

Publisher

 

Dunciad

 
bloodthirsty
 

ruffian

 

mentioned


Covenanters
 

extreme

 
oracle
 

Faculty

 

Advocates

 

library

 

proceedings

 

furnished

 

manuscript

 

Records


Parliamentary

 

corrected

 

memory

 
trusted
 
account
 

prisoners

 
throats
 

thinking

 

sacred

 

received