FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   580   581   582   583   584   585   586   587   588   589   590   591   592   593   594   595   596   597   598   599   600   601   602   603   604  
605   606   607   608   609   610   611   612   613   >>  
ong, proctor for the clergy of the diocese of Exeter. In another pamphlet, published at this time, the rural clergymen are said to have seen with an evil eye their London brethren refreshing themselves with sack after preaching. Several satirical allusions to the fable of the Town Mouse and the Country Mouse will be found in the pamphlets of that winter.] [Footnote 516: Barnet, ii, 33, 34. The best narratives of what passed in this Convocation are the Historical Account appended to the second edition of Vox Cleri, and the passage in Kennet's History to which I have already referred the reader. The former narrative is by a very high churchman, the latter by a very low churchman. Those who are desirous of obtaining fuller information must consult the contemporary pamphlets. Among them are Vox Populi; Vox Laici; Vox Regis et Regni; the Healing Attempt; the Letter to a Friend, by Dean Prideaux the Letter from a Minister in the Country to a Member of the Convocation; the Answer to the Merry Answer to Vox Cleri; the Remarks from the Country upon two Letters relating to the Convocation; the Vindication of the Letters in answer to Vox Cleri; the Answer to the Country Minister's Letter. All these tracts appeared late in 1689 or early in 1690.] [Footnote 517: "Halifax a eu une reprimande severe publiquement dans le conseil par le Prince d'Orange pour avoir trop balance."--Avaux to De Croissy, Dublin, June 1689. "his mercurial Wit," says Burnet, ii. 4., "was not well suited with the King's phlegm."] [Footnote 518: Clarendon's Diary, Oct. 10 1689; Lords' Journals, Oct. 19. 1689.] [Footnote 519: Commons' Journals, Oct. 24. 1689.] [Footnote 520: Ibid., Nov. 2. 1689.] [Footnote 521: Commons' Journals, Nov. 7. 19., Dec. 30 1689. The rule of the House then was that no petition could be received against the imposition of a tax. This rule was, after a very hard fight, rescinded in 1842. The petition of the Jews was not received, and is not mentioned in the Journals. But something may be learned about it from Narcissus Luttrell's Diary and from Grey's Debates, Nov. 19. 1689,] [Footnote 522: James, in the very treatise in which he tried to prove the Pope to be Antichrist, says "For myself, if that were yet the question, I would with all my heart give my consent that the Bishop of Rome should have the first seat." There is a remarkable letter on this subject written by James to Charles and Buckingham, when they were in Spain.
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   580   581   582   583   584   585   586   587   588   589   590   591   592   593   594   595   596   597   598   599   600   601   602   603   604  
605   606   607   608   609   610   611   612   613   >>  



Top keywords:
Footnote
 

Journals

 

Country

 

Convocation

 

Letter

 

Answer

 

received

 
pamphlets
 

Minister

 
churchman

Commons

 

petition

 

Letters

 

mercurial

 

Orange

 
Burnet
 

Clarendon

 
phlegm
 

Dublin

 

Croissy


suited

 
balance
 

consent

 

Bishop

 

question

 

Buckingham

 

Charles

 
written
 

subject

 

remarkable


letter
 

Antichrist

 
Prince
 

mentioned

 

rescinded

 

imposition

 

learned

 

treatise

 

Debates

 

Narcissus


Luttrell

 

winter

 

Barnet

 
satirical
 
Several
 

allusions

 
narratives
 

passage

 

edition

 

Kennet