FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   173   174   175   176   177   178   179   180   181   182   183   184   185   186   187   188   189   190   191   192   193   194   195   196   197  
198   199   200   201   202   203   204   205   206   207   208   209   210   211   212   213   214   215   216   217   218   219   220   221   222   >>   >|  
inly take place; and, if the assailant has an accurate knowledge of the locality and can give a suitable tactical and strategic direction to the mass of his forces, he may expect a complete success, unless unforeseen events occur. This is an operation by no means to be despised in war, although it is rare, and less brilliant than a great strategic combination which renders the victory certain even before the battle is fought. For the same reason that advantage should be taken of all opportunities for surprising an adversary, the necessary precautions should be used to prevent such attacks. The regulations for the government of any well-organized army should point out the means for doing the last. ARTICLE XXXV. Of the Attack by Main Force of Fortified Places, Intrenched Camps or Lines.--Of Coups de Main in General. There are many fortified places which, although not regular fortresses, are regarded as secure against _coups de main_, but may nevertheless be carried by escalade or assault, or through breaches not altogether practicable, but so steep as to require the use of ladders or some other means of getting to the parapet. The attack of a place of this kind presents nearly the same combinations as that of an intrenched camp; for both belong to the class of _coups de main_. This kind of attack will vary with circumstances: 1st, with the strength of the works; 2d, with the character of the ground on which they are built; 3d, with the fact of their being isolated or connected; 4th, with the morale of the respective parties. History gives us examples of all of these varieties. For examples, take the intrenched camps of Kehl, Dresden, and Warsaw, the lines of Turin and Mayence, the intrenchments of Feldkirch, Scharnitz, and Assiette. Here I have mentioned several cases, each with varying circumstances and results. At Kehl (1796) the intrenchments were better connected and better constructed than at Warsaw. There was, in fact, a _tete de pont_ nearly equal to a permanent fortification; for the archduke thought himself obliged to besiege it in form, and it would have been extremely hazardous for him to make an open attack upon it. At Warsaw the works were isolated, but of considerable relief, and they had as a keep a large city surrounded by loopholed walls, armed and defended by a number of desperate men. Dresden, in 1813, had for a keep a bastioned enceinte, one front of which, however, was disman
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   173   174   175   176   177   178   179   180   181   182   183   184   185   186   187   188   189   190   191   192   193   194   195   196   197  
198   199   200   201   202   203   204   205   206   207   208   209   210   211   212   213   214   215   216   217   218   219   220   221   222   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

Warsaw

 

attack

 

circumstances

 

intrenched

 
connected
 

isolated

 

examples

 
intrenchments
 

Dresden

 
strategic

defended

 
number
 

morale

 

desperate

 
History
 

surrounded

 

loopholed

 

respective

 

parties

 

belong


disman

 

strength

 

enceinte

 
bastioned
 

ground

 

character

 
constructed
 

extremely

 

hazardous

 

archduke


thought

 

fortification

 

permanent

 

besiege

 
results
 

varying

 
Mayence
 

considerable

 

relief

 
varieties

obliged

 

Feldkirch

 
Scharnitz
 

mentioned

 
Assiette
 

carried

 
renders
 
combination
 

victory

 
brilliant