FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   833   834   835   836   837   838   839   840   841   842   843   844   845   846   847   848   849   850   851   852   853   854   855   856   857  
858   859   860   861   862   863   864   865   866   867   868   869   870   871   872   873   874   875   876   877   878   879   880   881   882   >>   >|  
ut the militia in case of insurrection against the government of any State. It followed, said Taney, that the President "must, of necessity, decide which is the government, and which party is unlawfully arrayed against it, before he can perform the duty imposed upon him by the act of Congress"[289] and that his determination was not subject to review by the courts. DECLINE IN IMPORTANCE OF THIS GUARANTY With the recognition in the Debs Case[290] of the power and duty of the Federal Government to use "the entire strength of the Nation * * * to enforce in any part of the land the full and free exercise of all national powers and the security of all rights entrusted by the Constitution to its care,"[291] this clause has declined in importance. When that Government finds it necessary or desirable to use force to quell domestic violence, its power to protect the property of the United States, to remove obstructions to the United States mails, or to protect interstate commerce from interruption by labor disputes or otherwise, usually will furnish legal warrant for its action, without reference to this provision.[292] Notes [1] Clark _v._ Graham, 6 Wheat. 577 (1821), is an early case in which the Supreme Court enforced this rule. [2] Stat. 122 (1790); 2 Stat. 299 (1804), R.S. Sec. 905 28 U.S.C. Sec. 687. [3] Mankin _v._ Chandler & Co., 2 Brock. 125, 127 (1823). [4] 7 Cr. 481 (1813). _See_ also Everett _v._ Everett, 215 U.S. 203 (1909); Mutual L. Ins. Co. _v._ Harris, 97 U.S. 331 (1878). [5] On the same basis, a judgment cannot be impeached either in or out of the State by showing that it was based on a mistake of law. American Exp. Co. _v._ Mullins, 212 U.S. 311, 312 (1909); Fauntleroy _v._ Lum, 210 U.S. 230 (1908); Hartford L. Ins. Co. _v._ Barber, 245 U.S. 146 (1917); Hartford L. Ins. Co. _v._ Ibs, 237 U.S. 662 (1915). [6] 3 Wheat. 234 (1818). [7] 13 Pet. 312 (1839). _See also_ Bacon _v._ Howard, 20 How. 22, 25 (1858); Bank of Ala. _v._ Dalton, 9 How. 522, 528 (1850); Great Western Telegraph Co. _v._ Purdy, 162 U.S. 329 (1896); Christmas _v._ Russell, 5 Wall. 290, 301 (1866); Wisconsin _v._ Pelican Insurance Co., 127 U.S. 265, 292 (1888). [8] Cole _v._ Cunningham, 133 U.S. 107, 112 (1890). _See also_ Stacy _v._ Thrasher, use of Sellers, 6 How. 44, 61 (1848); Milwaukee County _v._ White (M.E.) Co., 296 U.S. 268 (1935). [9] Chicago & A.R. Co. _v._ Wiggins Ferry Co., 119 U.S. 615, 622 (1887); Han
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   833   834   835   836   837   838   839   840   841   842   843   844   845   846   847   848   849   850   851   852   853   854   855   856   857  
858   859   860   861   862   863   864   865   866   867   868   869   870   871   872   873   874   875   876   877   878   879   880   881   882   >>   >|  



Top keywords:
protect
 

Government

 

Hartford

 

States

 

United

 

government

 
Everett
 
Fauntleroy
 

Mullins

 
American

Barber

 

mistake

 
Harris
 

Mutual

 

judgment

 

showing

 

impeached

 

Cunningham

 
Insurance
 
Russell

Pelican

 

Wisconsin

 
County
 
Milwaukee
 

Thrasher

 

Sellers

 

Christmas

 
Howard
 

Wiggins

 

Telegraph


Western

 

Chicago

 

Dalton

 

recognition

 
entire
 

Federal

 
GUARANTY
 

DECLINE

 
courts
 

IMPORTANCE


strength

 

Nation

 

security

 
powers
 

rights

 

entrusted

 

Constitution

 

national

 

exercise

 
enforce