FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   852   853   854   855   856   857   858   859   860   861   862   863   864   865   866   867   868   869   870   871   872   873   874   875   876  
877   878   879   880   881   882   883   884   885   886   887   888   889   890   891   892   893   894   895   896   897   898   899   900   901   >>   >|  
f, as the one or the other Mode of Ratification may be proposed by the Congress; Provided that no Amendment which may be made prior to the Year One thousand eight hundred and eight shall in any Manner affect the first and fourth Clauses in the Ninth Section of the first Article; and that no State, without its Consent, shall be deprived of its equal Suffrage in the Senate. Amendment of the Constitution SCOPE OF AMENDING POWER When this Article was before the Constitutional Convention, a motion to insert a provision that "no State shall without its consent be affected in its internal policy" was made and rejected.[1] A further attempt to impose a substantive limitation on the amending power was made in 1861, when Congress submitted to the States a proposal to bar any future amendments which would authorize Congress to "interfere, within any State, with the domestic institutions thereof, * * *."[2] Three States ratified this article before the outbreak of the Civil War made it academic.[3] Many years later the validity of both the Eighteenth and Nineteenth Amendments was challenged because of their content. The arguments against the former took a wide range. Counsel urged that the power of amendment is limited to the correction of errors in the framing of the Constitution; that it does not comprehend the adoption of additional or supplementary provisions. They contended further that ordinary legislation cannot be embodied in a constitutional amendment and that Congress cannot constitutionally propose any amendment which involves the exercise or relinquishment of the sovereign powers of a State.[4] The Nineteenth Amendment was attacked on the narrower ground that a State which had not ratified the amendment would be deprived of its equal suffrage in the Senate because its representatives in that body would be persons not of its choosing, i.e., persons chosen by voters whom the State itself had not authorized to vote for Senators.[5] Brushing aside these arguments as unworthy of serious attention, the Supreme Court held both amendments valid. PROCEDURE OF ADOPTION Submission of Amendment When Madison submitted to the House of Representatives the proposals from which the Bill of Rights evolved, he contemplated that they should be incorporated in the text of the original instrument.[6] Instead the House decided to propose them as supplementary.[7] It ignored a suggestion that the two Houses should first r
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   852   853   854   855   856   857   858   859   860   861   862   863   864   865   866   867   868   869   870   871   872   873   874   875   876  
877   878   879   880   881   882   883   884   885   886   887   888   889   890   891   892   893   894   895   896   897   898   899   900   901   >>   >|  



Top keywords:
amendment
 

Amendment

 

Congress

 

Nineteenth

 

Constitution

 

propose

 
submitted
 
States
 

amendments

 
persons

ratified

 

Senate

 
deprived
 

arguments

 

supplementary

 

Article

 

adoption

 

chosen

 
comprehend
 
contended

provisions

 

representatives

 
voters
 
choosing
 

narrower

 

constitutionally

 

constitutional

 
relinquishment
 

exercise

 

involves


additional

 

embodied

 

sovereign

 

legislation

 
suffrage
 

ground

 
attacked
 

powers

 
ordinary
 

PROCEDURE


incorporated

 

original

 

instrument

 
contemplated
 

Rights

 

evolved

 

Instead

 

suggestion

 

Houses

 
decided