FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   869   870   871   872   873   874   875   876   877   878   879   880   881   882   883   884   885   886   887   888   889   890   891   892   893  
894   895   896   897   898   899   900   901   902   903   904   905   906   907   908   909   910   911   912   913   914   915   916   917   918   >>   >|  
hority to extend immunity only to the governmental functions of the federal land banks; the only governmental functions of the land banks are those performed by acting as depositaries and fiscal agents for the federal government and providing a market for governmental bonds; all other functions of the land banks are private; petitioner here was engaged in an activity incidental to its business of lending money, an essentially private function; therefore Sec. 26 cannot operate to strike down a sales tax upon purchases made in furtherance of petitioner's lending functions."[90] The Court rejected this argument and invalidated the tax saying: "The argument that the lending functions of the federal land banks are proprietary rather than governmental misconceives the nature of the federal government with respect to every function which it performs. The federal government is one of delegated powers, and from that it necessarily follows that any constitutional exercise of its delegated powers is governmental. * * * It also follows that, when Congress constitutionally creates a corporation through which the federal government lawfully acts, the activities of such corporation are governmental."[91] However, in the absence of federal legislation, a state law laying a percentage tax on the users of safety deposit services, measured by the banks' charges therefor, was held valid as applied to national banks. The tax, being on the user, did not, the Court held, impose an intrinsically unconstitutional burden on a federal instrumentality.[92] THE ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION; "ACTIVITIES" OF In the recent case of Carson _v._ Roane-Anderson Co.,[93] the Court was confronted with an attempt on the part of Tennessee to apply its tax on the use within the State of goods purchased elsewhere to a private contractor for the Atomic Energy Commission and to vendors of such contractors. This, the Court held, could not be done under Section 9 b of the Atomic Energy Commission Act, which provides in part that: "The Commission, and the property, activities, and income of the Commission, are hereby expressly exempted from taxation in any manner or form by any State, county, municipality, or any subdivision thereof."[94] The power of exemption, said the Court, "stems from the power to preserve and protect functions validly authorized--the power to make all laws necessary and proper for carrying into execution the powers vested in Congress."[95] T
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   869   870   871   872   873   874   875   876   877   878   879   880   881   882   883   884   885   886   887   888   889   890   891   892   893  
894   895   896   897   898   899   900   901   902   903   904   905   906   907   908   909   910   911   912   913   914   915   916   917   918   >>   >|  



Top keywords:
federal
 

governmental

 

functions

 

government

 

Commission

 

private

 
lending
 
powers
 

Congress

 
Atomic

argument

 

corporation

 
activities
 

function

 

petitioner

 

delegated

 

Energy

 

purchased

 
contractor
 
Tennessee

ATOMIC

 

ENERGY

 
COMMISSION
 
ACTIVITIES
 

intrinsically

 

unconstitutional

 

burden

 
instrumentality
 

Anderson

 

confronted


Carson

 

recent

 

attempt

 

exemption

 
thereof
 

subdivision

 
county
 

municipality

 
preserve
 

protect


execution

 

proper

 

carrying

 
validly
 

authorized

 

manner

 

taxation

 

Section

 

contractors

 
impose