FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   464   465   466   467   468   469   470   471   472   473   474   475   476   477   478   479   480   481   482   483   484   485   486   487   488  
489   490   491   492   493   494   495   496   497   498   499   500   501   502   503   504   505   506   507   508   509   510   511   512   >>  
a remarkable way. Thiers states that Castlereagh, after hearing of them, sent Aberdeen new instructions. I cannot find any in our archives. This letter warned Aberdeen against any compromise on the subject of Antwerp; but it is clear that Castlereagh, when he came to the allied headquarters, was a partisan of peace, as compared with the Czar and the Prussian patriots. Schwarzenberg wrote (January 26th) at Langres: "We ought to make peace here: our Kaiser, also Stadion, Metternich, even Castlereagh, are fully of this opinion--but Kaiser Alexander!"] [Footnote 390: Fournier, "Der Congress von Chatillon," p. 242.] [Footnote 391: "Castlereagh Papers," _loc. cit._, p. 112.] [Footnote 392: Metternich. "Memoirs," vol. i., p. 214.] [Footnote 393: "F.O.," Austria, No. 102.] [Footnote 394: "Lettres inedites" (November 6th, 1813).] [Footnote 395: The memorandum is endorsed, "Extract of Instructions delivered to me by Gen. Pozzo di Borgo, 18 Dec, 1813" ("Russia," No. 92).] [Footnote 396: Metternich's letter to Hudelist, in Fournier, p. 242.] [Footnote 397: Houssaye's "1814," p. 14; Metternich, "Memoirs," vol. i., p. 308.] [Footnote 398: "Our success and everything depend upon our moderation and justice," he wrote to Lord Bathurst (Napier, bk. xxiii., ch. ii.).] [Footnote 399: "Lettres inedites" (November 12th). The date is important: it refutes Napier's statement (bk. xxiii., ch. iv.) that the Emperor had planned that Ferdinand should enter Spain early in November when the disputes between Wellington and the Cortes at Madrid were at their height. Bignon (vol. xiii., p. 88 _et seq._) says that Talleyrand's indiscretion revealed the negotiations to the Spanish Cortes and Wellington; but our general's despatches show that he did not hear of them before January 9th or 10th. He then wrote: "I have long suspected that Bonaparte would adopt this expedient; and if he had had less pride and more common sense, it would have succeeded."] [Footnote 400: On January 14th the Emperor ordered Soult, as soon as the ratification of the treaty*treatry was known, to set out northwards from Bayonne "with all his army, only leaving what is necessary to form a screen." Suchet was likewise to hurry with 10,000 foot, _en poste_, and two-thirds of his horse, to Lyons. On the 22nd the Emperor blames both Marshals for not sending off the infantry, though the Spanish treaty had _not_ been ratified. After long delays Ferdinand set out
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   464   465   466   467   468   469   470   471   472   473   474   475   476   477   478   479   480   481   482   483   484   485   486   487   488  
489   490   491   492   493   494   495   496   497   498   499   500   501   502   503   504   505   506   507   508   509   510   511   512   >>  



Top keywords:
Footnote
 

Castlereagh

 

Metternich

 

November

 
Emperor
 

January

 
Ferdinand
 

Spanish

 
Aberdeen
 
Cortes

Fournier

 

treaty

 

Kaiser

 

letter

 

inedites

 
Lettres
 
Wellington
 

Memoirs

 

Napier

 
Bonaparte

planned

 

suspected

 

despatches

 

Bignon

 

disputes

 

Madrid

 

height

 

general

 
Talleyrand
 
indiscretion

revealed

 
negotiations
 

ratification

 

thirds

 

likewise

 

Suchet

 

blames

 
ratified
 

delays

 
infantry

Marshals

 

sending

 

screen

 
succeeded
 
ordered
 

common

 

expedient

 

leaving

 

Bayonne

 

treatry