FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   11   12   13   14   15   16   17   18   19   20   21   22   23   24   25   26   27   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35  
36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52   53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   >>   >|  
een erected in the same style throughout; and this is more particularly observable in the churches of the fifteenth century. Q. Were they constructed on any regular plan? A. The general ground plan of cathedral and conventual churches was after the form of a cross, and the edifice consisted of a central tower, with transepts running north and south; westward of the tower was the nave or main body of the structure, with lateral aisles; and the west front contained the principal entrance, and was often flanked by towers. Eastward of the central tower was the choir, where the principal service was performed, with aisles on each side, and beyond this was the lady chapel. Sometimes the design also comprehended other chapels. On the north or south side was the chapter house, in early times quadrangular, but afterwards octagonal in plan; and on the same side, in most instances, though not always, were the cloisters, which communicated immediately with the church, and surrounded a quadrangular court. The chapter house and cloisters we still find remaining as adjuncts to most cathedral churches, though the conventual buildings of a domestic nature, with which the cloisters formerly also communicated, have generally been destroyed. Mere parochial churches have commonly a tower at the west end, a nave with lateral aisles, and a chancel. Some churches have transepts; and small side chapels or additional aisles have been annexed to many, erected at the costs of individuals, to serve for burial and as chantries. The smallest class of churches have a nave and chancel only, with a small bell-turret formed of wooden shingles, or an open arch of stonework, appearing above the roof at the west end. [Illustration: SEDILIA, St. Martin's, Leicester, circa A. D. 1250.] CHAPTER II. OF THE DIFFERENT KINDS OF ARCHES. Q. Do the distinctions of the different styles, as they differ from each other, depend at all upon the form of the arch? A. To a certain extent the form of the arch may be considered as a criterion of style; too much dependence, however, must not be placed on this rule, inasmuch as there are many exceptions. Q. How are arches divided generally, as to form? A. Into the triangular-headed or straight-lined pointed arch, the round-headed arch, and the curved-pointed arch; and the latter are again subdivided. Q. How is the triangular-headed or straight-lined pointed arch formed, and when did it prevail?
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   11   12   13   14   15   16   17   18   19   20   21   22   23   24   25   26   27   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35  
36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52   53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

churches

 

aisles

 

cloisters

 

headed

 

pointed

 

principal

 

chancel

 

formed

 

chapels

 

communicated


lateral
 

chapter

 

quadrangular

 
generally
 

transepts

 

central

 

triangular

 

conventual

 
straight
 

cathedral


erected

 

Leicester

 
wooden
 

curved

 

Martin

 
prevail
 

turret

 

Illustration

 

appearing

 

stonework


CHAPTER
 

shingles

 
subdivided
 
SEDILIA
 

DIFFERENT

 

smallest

 

considered

 

criterion

 

extent

 

exceptions


dependence
 

ARCHES

 

distinctions

 

depend

 
differ
 

arches

 

styles

 

divided

 

entrance

 
flanked