erstand _one
material globe of globes_ as constituting and comprehending the
Universe? Such a fancy would be altogether at war with every assumption
and consideration of this Discourse.
I have already alluded to that absolute _reciprocity of adaptation_
which is the idiosyncrasy of the divine Art--stamping it divine. Up to
this point of our reflections, we have been regarding the electrical
influence as a something by dint of whose repulsion alone Matter is
enabled to exist in that state of diffusion demanded for the fulfilment
of its purposes:--so far, in a word, we have been considering the
influence in question as ordained for Matter's sake--to subserve the
objects of matter. With a perfectly legitimate reciprocity, we are now
permitted to look at Matter, as created _solely for the sake of this
influence_--solely to serve the objects of this spiritual Ether. Through
the aid--by the means--through the agency of Matter, and by dint of its
heterogeneity--is this Ether manifested--is _Spirit individualized_. It is
merely in the development of this Ether, through heterogeneity, that
particular masses of Matter become animate--sensitive--and in the ratio of
their heterogeneity;--some reaching a degree of sensitiveness involving
what we call _Thought_ and thus attaining Conscious Intelligence.
In this view, we are enabled to perceive Matter as a Means--not as an
End. Its purposes are thus seen to have been comprehended in its
diffusion; and with the return into Unity these purposes cease. The
absolutely consolidated globe of globes would be _objectless_:--therefore
not for a moment could it continue to exist. Matter, created for an end,
would unquestionably, on fulfilment of that end, be Matter no longer.
Let us endeavor to understand that it would disappear, and that God
would remain all in all.
That every work of Divine conception must coeexist and coeexpire with its
particular design, seems to me especially obvious; and I make no doubt
that, on perceiving the final globe of globes to be _objectless_, the
majority of my readers will be satisfied with my "_therefore_ it cannot
continue to exist." Nevertheless, as the startling thought of its
instantaneous disappearance is one which the most powerful intellect
cannot be expected readily to entertain on grounds so decidedly
abstract, let us endeavor to look at the idea from some other and more
ordinary point of view:--let us see how thoroughly and beautifully it is
cor
|