FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   18   19   20   21   22   23   24   25   26   27   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42  
43   44   45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52   53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   65   >>  
um Aberdonensium proposuit vir reverendus C. Buchanan, Coll. Bengalensis Praefectus Vicarius. Auctore Alexandro Adamson, A.M., Coll. Marisch. Aberd. alumno." Allow me to repeat a Query which was inserted in Vol. ii., p. 297., asking for any information respecting J. Adamson, the author of a rare tract on Edward II.'s reign, published in 1732, in defence of the Walpole administration from the attacks of the _Craftsman_. Who was John Adamson, author of _Fanny of Caernarvon, or the War of the Roses_, an historical romance, of which a French translation was published in 1809 at Paris, in 2 vols. 12mo.? E. H. A. _Canker or Brier Rose._--Can any of your correspondents tell me why the brier or dog-rose was anciently called the _canker_? The brier is particularly free from the disease so called, and the name does not appear to have been used in disparagement. In Shakspeare's beautiful Sonnet LIV. are the lines: "The _canker-blooms_ have full as deep a dye, As the perfumed tincture of the roses." In _King Henry IV._, Act I. Sc. 3., Hotspur says: "Shall it for shame be spoken in these days, Or fill up chronicles in times to come, That men of your nobility and power, Did 'gage them both in an unjust behalf, (As both of you, God pardon it! have done) To put down Richard, that sweet lovely rose And plant this thorn, this _canker_ Bolingbroke." And again, Don John, in _Much Ado about Nothing_, Act I. Sc. 3.: "I had rather be a _canker_ in a hedge, than a rose in the grave." ANON. "_Short red, god red._"--In Roger of Wendover's _Chronicle_, Bohn's edition, vol. i. p. 345., is a story how Walchere, Bishop of Durham, was slain in his county court, A.D. 1075, by the suitors on the instigation of one who cried out in his native tongue "Schort red, god red, slea ye the bischop." Sir Walter Scott, in his _Tales of a Grandfather_ (vol. i. p. 85.), tells the same story of a Bishop of Caithness who was burned for enforcing tithes in the reign of Alexander II. of Scotland (about 1220). What authority is there for the latter story? Did Sir Walter confound the two bishops, or did he add the circumstance for the amusement of Hugh Littlejohn? Was this the formula usually adopted on such occasions? How came the Caithness people to speak such good Saxon? G. _Overseers of Wills._--I have copies of several wills of the fifteenth and sixteenth centuries, in {501} which one set of perso
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   18   19   20   21   22   23   24   25   26   27   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42  
43   44   45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52   53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   65   >>  



Top keywords:

canker

 

Adamson

 
Walter
 

Caithness

 

called

 

Bishop

 

published

 
author
 

Overseers

 

copies


Chronicle

 

people

 

Walchere

 
Wendover
 
edition
 

lovely

 

Richard

 
centuries
 

Nothing

 

sixteenth


fifteenth
 

Bolingbroke

 
occasions
 

burned

 

enforcing

 

Grandfather

 

pardon

 

circumstance

 

tithes

 
confound

bishops

 

authority

 

Alexander

 
Scotland
 

bischop

 
suitors
 
instigation
 

adopted

 

county

 
formula

native

 
tongue
 
Schort
 

amusement

 

Littlejohn

 

Durham

 

Craftsman

 
Caernarvon
 
attacks
 

administration