FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52   53  
54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   65   >>  
, he says, of making the pictures appear to stand out unnaturally; that is to say, if the cameras were to be placed 12 inches apart (which would be equal to 1 in 8), the pictures would seem to be in greater relief than the objects. I find that the pictures on a French stereoscopic slide I have by me have been taken at an angle of 10 deg., or 1 in 6. This was evidently photographed at a considerable distance, the triumphal arch in the Place de Carousel (of which it is a representation) being reduced to about 11/4 inch in height. How comes it then that the angle is here increased to 10 deg. from 61/2 deg., or to 1 in 6 from 1 in 9. Moreover, the only work I have been able to obtain on the mode of taking stereoscopic pictures, lays it down that all portraits, or near objects, should be taken under an angle of 15 deg., or, as it says, 1 in 5; that is, if the camera is 20 feet from the sitter, the distance between its first and second position (supposing only one to be used) should not exceed 4 feet: otherwise, adds the author, "the stereosity will appear unnaturally great." When two cameras are employed, the instructions proceed to state that the distance between them would be about 1/10th of the distance from the part of the object focussed. The example given is a group of portraits, and the angle, 1 in 10, is afterwards spoken of as being equivalent to an arc of 10 deg. Farther on, we are told that "the angle should be lessened as the distance between the nearest and farthest objects increase. Example: if the farthest object be twice as far from the camera as the near object, the angle should be 5 deg. to a central point between these two. Now, I find by calculation that the measurements and the angle here mentioned by no means {506} agree. For instance, an angle of 15 deg. is spoken of as being equivalent to the measurement 1 in 5. An angle of 10 deg. is said, or implied, to be the same as 1 in 10. This is far from being the fact. According to my calculations, the following are the real equivalents:-- An angle of 15 deg. is equal to 1 in 4. " 12 deg. " 1 in 5. " 10 deg. " 1 in 6. " 6-1/2 deg. " 1 in 9. " 6 deg. " 1 in 10. " 5 deg. " 1 in 12. " 4 deg. " 1 in 15. Will any of your readers oblige me by solving the above anomalies, and by giving the proper angles or measurement u
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52   53  
54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   65   >>  



Top keywords:

distance

 
pictures
 

objects

 
object
 

measurement

 

equivalent

 
spoken
 

camera

 

farthest

 

portraits


unnaturally

 
stereoscopic
 

cameras

 

lessened

 

increase

 

nearest

 

Example

 
making
 

central

 

focussed


calculation

 

Farther

 

readers

 

equivalents

 

oblige

 
solving
 
angles
 

proper

 
giving
 

anomalies


calculations
 

proceed

 

mentioned

 

instance

 
According
 

implied

 

measurements

 

French

 
increased
 

Moreover


relief

 
taking
 

obtain

 

height

 

triumphal

 
considerable
 

evidently

 
photographed
 

Carousel

 

reduced