FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   2064   2065   2066   2067   2068   2069   2070   2071   2072   2073   2074   2075   2076   2077   2078   2079   2080   2081   2082   2083   2084   2085   2086   2087   2088  
2089   2090   2091   2092   2093   2094   2095   2096   2097   2098   2099   2100   2101   2102   2103   2104   2105   2106   2107   2108   2109   2110   2111   >>  
ere are frequent Deviations from Art in the Works of the greatest Masters, which have produced a much nobler Effect than a more accurate and exact way of Proceeding could have done. This often arises from what the _Italians_ call the _Gusto Grande_ in these Arts, which is what we call the Sublime in Writing. In the next Place, our Criticks do not seem sensible that there is more Beauty in the Works of a great Genius who is ignorant of the Rules of Art, than in those of a little Genius who knows and observes them. It is of these Men of Genius that _Terence_ speaks, in Opposition to the little artificial Cavillers of his Time; 'Quorum aemulari exoptat negligentiam Potius, quam istorum obscuram diligentiam.' A Critick may have the same Consolation in the ill Success of his Play, as Dr. _South_ tells us a Physician has at the Death of a Patient, That he was killed _secundum artem_. Our inimitable _Shakespear_ is a Stumbling-Block to the whole Tribe of these rigid Criticks. Who would not rather read one of his Plays, where there is not a single Rule of the Stage observed, than any Production of a modern Critick, where there is not one of them violated? _Shakespear_ was indeed born with all the Seeds of Poetry, and may be compared to the Stone in _Pyrrhus's_ Ring, which, as _Pliny_ tells us, had the Figure of _Apollo_ and the Nine Muses in the Veins of it, produced by the spontaneous Hand of Nature, without any Help from Art. [Footnote 1: John Dennis's invention, of which he said with exultation, 'That's my thunder.'] * * * * * No. 593. Monday, September 13, 1714. Byrom. 'Quale per incertam Lunam sub luce maligna Est iter in Sylvis:--' Virg. My dreaming Correspondent, Mr. _Shadow_, has sent me a second Letter, with several curious Observations on Dreams in general, and the Method to render Sleep improving: An Extract of his Letter will not, I presume, be disagreeable to my Readers. 'Since we have so little Time to spare, that none of it may be lost, I see no Reason why we should neglect to examine those imaginary Scenes we are presented with in Sleep, only because they have less Reality in them than our waking Meditations. A Traveller would bring his Judgment in Question who should despise the Directions of his Map for want of real Roads in it, because here stands a _Dott_ instead of a Town, or a
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   2064   2065   2066   2067   2068   2069   2070   2071   2072   2073   2074   2075   2076   2077   2078   2079   2080   2081   2082   2083   2084   2085   2086   2087   2088  
2089   2090   2091   2092   2093   2094   2095   2096   2097   2098   2099   2100   2101   2102   2103   2104   2105   2106   2107   2108   2109   2110   2111   >>  



Top keywords:

Genius

 

Letter

 

Critick

 
Criticks
 

Shakespear

 
produced
 

Footnote

 

dreaming

 

Correspondent

 
Nature

spontaneous

 

Dennis

 

Shadow

 

exultation

 

Monday

 

September

 

thunder

 
incertam
 
Sylvis
 
maligna

invention

 

Extract

 
Meditations
 

waking

 

Traveller

 

Judgment

 

Reality

 
Scenes
 

imaginary

 

presented


Question

 

despise

 

stands

 

Directions

 

examine

 

neglect

 

render

 
Method
 

improving

 
general

Dreams

 

curious

 

Observations

 

presume

 

disagreeable

 

Reason

 

Readers

 

single

 

ignorant

 

observes