FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   285   286   287   288   289   290   291   292   293   294   295   296   297   298   299   300   301   302   303   304   305   306   307   308   309  
310   311   312   313   314   315   316   317   318   319   320   321   322   323   324   325   326   327   328   329   330   331   332   333   334   >>   >|  
n of Imperial legislation. But bills, including those relating to finance, originate ordinarily with the Chancellor and the Bundesrath; the procedure followed in the shaping of revenue and military measures puts the Reichstag distinctly at a disadvantage; and, at the best, the part which the chamber can play in the public policy of the Empire is negative and subsidiary. It can block legislation and discuss at length the policy of the Government, but it is not vested by the constitution with power sufficient to make it an effective instrument of control. It is within the competence of the Bundesrath, with the assent of the Emperor, to dissolve the popular chamber at any time, and, as has been pointed out, such action is taken without an iota of the ministerial responsibility which in other nations ordinarily accompanies the right of dissolution. On several occasions since 1871 the Reichstag has been dissolved with the sheer intent of putting an end to its obstructionism.[340] [Footnote 340: Lowell, Governments and Parties, I., 257.] The standing orders of the chamber make mention of the right of interpellation, and resort is occasionally had to this characteristic continental legislative practice. There are no ministers, however, to whom an interpellation may be addressed except the Chancellor, and even he has no right to appear in the Reichstag save as a member of the Bundesrath. The consequence is that interpellations are addressed, in practice, to the Bundesrath. It is only where the parliamentary system prevails, as in France and Italy, that the device of interpellation can be made to assume much importance. The possibility of a larger opportunity for interpellation, which should involve the right of the chamber to adopt resolutions declaring satisfaction or dissatisfaction with the answer made, was warmly, but on the whole inconclusively, discussed in the Reichstag in 1912.[341] [Footnote 341: On the Reichstag see Howard, The German Empire, Chap. 5; A. Lebon, Le Reichstag allemand, in _Annales de l'Ecole Libre des Sciences Politiques_, April, 1889; ibid., Etudes sur l'Allemagne politique, Chap. 2; Laband, Das Staatsrecht des deutschen Reiches, Secs. 32-38; H. Robalsky, Der deutsche Reichstag (Berlin, 1897); G. Leser, Unter
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   285   286   287   288   289   290   291   292   293   294   295   296   297   298   299   300   301   302   303   304   305   306   307   308   309  
310   311   312   313   314   315   316   317   318   319   320   321   322   323   324   325   326   327   328   329   330   331   332   333   334   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

Reichstag

 

interpellation

 

Bundesrath

 

chamber

 

policy

 
legislation
 

Empire

 

Chancellor

 
Footnote
 

ordinarily


practice
 
addressed
 

larger

 

opportunity

 
declaring
 

resolutions

 

possibility

 

satisfaction

 

dissatisfaction

 
involve

system

 

member

 
consequence
 

interpellations

 

device

 

assume

 
France
 

parliamentary

 
answer
 
prevails

importance

 

Staatsrecht

 
deutschen
 

Reiches

 

Laband

 

Etudes

 

Allemagne

 

politique

 

Berlin

 
deutsche

Robalsky

 

Howard

 

German

 

discussed

 

warmly

 
inconclusively
 

Sciences

 

Politiques

 

allemand

 
Annales